Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35398911›Full record

ArticleActa paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)2023

Routine conversations about violence conducted in Swedish child health services-A mixed methods study of nurses' experiences.

Jennie Nimborg, Ulrika Lindskog, Lena Nordgren, Eva-Maria Annerbäck

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jennie NimborgCentre for Clinical Research in Sörmland, Uppsala University, Eskilstuna, Sweden.
Ulrika LindskogCentre for Clinical Research in Sörmland, Uppsala University, Eskilstuna, Sweden.
Lena NordgrenCentre for Clinical Research in Sörmland, Uppsala University, Eskilstuna, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0667-7111
Eva-Maria AnnerbäckCentre for Clinical Research in Sörmland, Uppsala University, Eskilstuna, Sweden.
Uppsala University · SE

Funding

Landstinget Sörmland
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate an intervention where nurses in child health care services routinely talk to and inform parents about violence.

methodsThe intervention included providing information during home visits and individual conversations with mothers and fathers/partners in connection with screening for parental depression. A convergent mixed-methods design was used with a documentation form for each child (n = 475) and results from focus group interviews with nurses. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and qualitative with manifest content analysis.

resultsAlmost all families participated in the intervention; individual conversations were conducted with nearly all the mothers, and to a somewhat lesser extent with the fathers/partners. Initially, the nurses felt slightly uncomfortable about these conversations, but described experiencing development and professionalisation in their role of talking about violence. Parents' reactions were generally positive and they expressed appreciation for this topic being raised.

conclusionThe results show that the intervention has been carried out successfully. The newborn period is a phase in which mothers and fathers are interested and receptive to knowledge and support in sensitive matters. Prerequisites for implementation were the preparation phase for the nurses, the use of routine questioning and a questionnaire as a basis for the conversations.

Indexed as

Child Health ServicesNursesChildFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornParentsSwedenViolencechild abusechild health careparentspreventionviolence

Identifiers

PMID35398911
PMCPMC10084205
OpenAlexW4223555610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.