ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2022
The Genomic Landscape of Early-Stage Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma.
Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Review
- Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) testing of high-grade serous carcinoma using cytological samples.BJC reports · 2026Article
- A tumor profiling resource for ovarian cancer: insights into chemotherapy-driven heterogeneity and personalized treatment strategy.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Association of hormone receptor-based pathological features with prognosis in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study and nomogram construction.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Article
- DNA Copy Number Profiling in Extracellular Vesicles as Clinical Biomarkers of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma.Journal of extracellular vesicles · 2026Article
- Harnessing viral footprints in circulating free DNA (cfDNA) for early cancer detection: A focus on liquid-biopsy-based screening.International journal of cancer · 2026Review
- Identification of actionable targets using DEPArray-based sorting of pure carcinoma and stromal populations from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues followed by shallow whole-genome sequencing.The Journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Revisiting Genomic Instability, Tumor Microenvironment and Immune Response in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2025Article
- Nanopore-based consensus sequencing enables accurate multimodal tumor cell-free DNA profiling.Genome research · 2025Article
- Identification of a TNIK-CDK9 Axis as a Targetable Strategy for Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer.Molecular cancer therapeutics · 2025Article
- APOBEC3A drives ovarian cancer metastasis by altering epithelial-mesenchymal transition.JCI insight · 2025Article
- Leveraging Multi-omics to Disentangle the Complexity of Ovarian Cancer.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2025Review
- Aggressive Serous Carcinomas of the Female Reproductive Tract: Cancer-Prone Cell States and Genetic Drivers.Cancers · 2025Review
- Early Diagnosis of Ovarian Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of the Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Interplay of replication stress response and immune microenvironment in high-grade serous ovarian cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Immune-molecular interactions in high-grade serous ovarian cancer distinguish long-term survivors.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2024Article
- PTEN Loss Shapes Macrophage Dynamics in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma.Cancer research · 2024Article
- Molecular profiling reveals novel therapeutic targets and clonal evolution in ovarian clear cell carcinoma.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Proteomic landscape of epithelial ovarian cancer.Nature communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeOvarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) is usually diagnosed at late stage. We investigated whether late-stage HGSC has unique genomic characteristics consistent with acquisition of evolutionary advantage compared with early-stage tumors. EXPERIMENTAL
designWe performed targeted next-generation sequencing and shallow whole-genome sequencing (sWGS) on pretreatment samples from 43 patients with FIGO stage I-IIA HGSC to investigate somatic mutations and copy-number (CN) alterations (SCNA). We compared results to pretreatment samples from 52 patients with stage IIIC/IV HGSC from the BriTROC-1 study.
resultsAge of diagnosis did not differ between early-stage and late-stage patients (median 61.3 years vs. 62.3 years, respectively). TP53 mutations were near-universal in both cohorts (89% early-stage, 100% late-stage), and there were no significant differences in the rates of other somatic mutations, including BRCA1 and BRCA2. We also did not observe cohort-specific focal SCNA that could explain biological behavior. However, ploidy was higher in late-stage (median, 3.0) than early-stage (median, 1.9) samples. CN signature exposures were significantly different between cohorts, with greater relative signature 3 exposure in early-stage and greater signature 4 in late-stage. Unsupervised clustering based on CN signatures identified three clusters that were prognostic.
conclusionsEarly-stage and late-stage HGSCs have highly similar patterns of mutation and focal SCNA. However, CN signature analysis showed that late-stage disease has distinct signature exposures consistent with whole-genome duplication. Further analyses will be required to ascertain whether these differences reflect genuine biological differences between early-stage and late-stage or simply time-related markers of evolutionary fitness. See related commentary by Yang et al., p. 2730.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.