Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35398874›Full record

ReviewThe American journal of case reports2022

A 60-Year-Old Swiss Woman Presenting with Migratory Radicular Pain Diagnosed with Lyme Disease by Western Blot.

Gisela Marcelino, João Cerveira, André Teychené, Armand Eichenberger

Open access · hybridAbstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in The American journal of case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 98% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gisela MarcelinoPrivate Clinical Practice, Marly, Switzerland.
João CerveiraService of General Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Nant's Foundation, Corsier-sur-Vevey, Switzerland.
André TeychenéPrivate Clinical Practice, Marly, Switzerland.
Armand EichenbergerPrivate Clinical Practice, Marly, Switzerland.
IS practice · BEFondation de Nant · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Many diagnostic guidelines have been established to support the diagnosis of Lyme disease, but a recent meta-analysis did not find that 2-tier tests were better than individual tests. Here, we present the case of a patient who was diagnosed by immunoblot only, a second-line test that is usually not performed if the first-line test is negative. CASE REPORT A 60-year-old Swiss woman, without relevant comorbidities, presented to our clinic with 1-week symptoms of migratory radiculitis in the L1, L2, and L5-S1 right dermatomes. Blood analysis and lumbar and brain MRI did not show any significant abnormalities. However, unexpected results were obtained after testing Lyme serologies. They were performed first with LIAISON® test (Diasorin, Italy) then with Borrelia VIRAstripe® immunoblot (Viramed, Germany) and a positive IgM result was only obtained with the latter. Consequently, doxycycline 100 mg 2×/day was initiated and the symptoms completely resolved after 6 weeks of treatment. Ever since, and more than 1 year after the initial presentation, the patient remains symptom-free. CONCLUSIONS As shown, it was possible to diagnose this patient and treat her successfully by testing all the available serologies. Furthermore, we were surprised to find out after a review of the literature that the IgM sensitivity in neuroborreliosis with the LIAISON® test is only 43.9-46% versus 90-100% with VIRAstripe®. Hence, clinicians need to understand the pitfalls of these tests before excluding Lyme disease.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BacterialLyme DiseaseBlotting, WesternFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MMiddle AgedPainSwitzerlandAntibodies, BacterialImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin M

Identifiers

PMID35398874
PMCPMC9009069
OpenAlexW4220679581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.