Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35398717›Full record

ArticleESMO open2022

Biomarkers of systemic inflammation predict survival with first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small-cell lung cancer.

M Stares, T E Ding, C Stratton, F Thomson, M Baxter, H Cagney, K Cumming, A Swan, F Ross, C Barrie and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Prognostic value of SUVTranslational lung cancer research · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

M StaresEdinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh; University of Edinburgh, Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh.
T E DingEdinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh.
C StrattonUniversity of Edinburgh, Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh.
F ThomsonUniversity of Edinburgh, Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh.
M BaxterDivision of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee; Tayside Cancer Centre, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, NHS Tayside, Dundee.
H CagneySchool of Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
K CummingEdinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh.
A SwanEdinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh.
F RossEdinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh.
C BarrieEdinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh.
K MaclennanEdinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh.
S CampbellEdinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh.
T EvansEdinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh.
A TufailEdinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh.
S HarrowEdinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh.
H LordTayside Cancer Centre, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, NHS Tayside, Dundee.
B LairdUniversity of Edinburgh, Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh.
M MacKeanEdinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh.
I PhillipsEdinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh; University of Edinburgh, Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh. Electronic address: Iain.phillips@nhslothian.scot.nhs.uk.
Western General Hospital · GBEdinburgh Cancer Research · GBNHS Lothian · GBNinewells Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPembrolizumab is an established first-line option for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) expressing programmed death-ligand 1 ≥50%. Durable responses are seen in a subset of patients; however, many derive little clinical benefit. Biomarkers of the systemic inflammatory response predict survival in NSCLC. We evaluated their prognostic significance in patients receiving first-line pembrolizumab for advanced NSCLC.

methodsPatients treated with first-line pembrolizumab for advanced NSCLC with programmed death-ligand 1 expression ≥50% at two regional Scottish cancer centres were identified. Pretreatment inflammatory biomarkers (white cell count, neutrophil count, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, platelet/lymphocyte ratio, albumin, prognostic nutritional index) were recorded. The relationship between these and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were examined.

resultsData were available for 219 patients. On multivariate analysis, albumin and neutrophil count were independently associated with PFS (P < 0.001, P = 0.002, respectively) and OS (both P < 0.001). A simple score combining these biomarkers was explored. The Scottish Inflammatory Prognostic Score (SIPS) assigned 1 point each for albumin <35 g/l and neutrophil count >7.5 × 10

conclusionsSIPS, a simple score combining albumin and neutrophil count, predicts survival in patients with NSCLC receiving first-line pembrolizumab. Unlike many proposed prognostic scores, SIPS uses only routinely collected pretreatment test results and provides a categorical score. It stratifies survival across clinically meaningful time periods that may assist clinicians and patients with treatment decisions. We advocate validation of the prognostic utility of SIPS in this and other immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment settings.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsAlbuminsBiomarkersHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsInflammationAlbuminsBiomarkersImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorsbiomarkerimmune checkpoint inhibitorsinflammationnon-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)prognosisScottish Inflammatory Prognostic Score (SIPS)

Identifiers

PMID35398717
PMCPMC9058907
OpenAlexW4223434510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.