Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35398581›Full record

ArticleNew biotechnology2022

Pre-analytical sample stabilization by different sampling devices for PCR-based COVID-19 diagnostics.

Melina Hardt, Esther Föderl-Höbenreich, Stephanie Freydl, Antonio Kouros, Martina Loibner, Kurt Zatloukal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in New biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Vitamin DFrontiers in oral health · 2026
    Trial
  2. Detection of Respiratory Pathogens in Saliva and Mouthwash Samples in Children.Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Melina HardtDiagnostic- and Research Center for Molecular Biomedicine, Diagnostic- and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Esther Föderl-HöbenreichDiagnostic- and Research Center for Molecular Biomedicine, Diagnostic- and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Stephanie FreydlDiagnostic- and Research Center for Molecular Biomedicine, Diagnostic- and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Antonio KourosDiagnostic- and Research Center for Molecular Biomedicine, Diagnostic- and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Martina LoibnerDiagnostic- and Research Center for Molecular Biomedicine, Diagnostic- and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Kurt ZatloukalDiagnostic- and Research Center for Molecular Biomedicine, Diagnostic- and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria. Electronic address: kurt.zatloukal@medunigraz.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic created an unprecedented requirement for diagnostic testing, challenging not only healthcare workers and laboratories, but also providers. Quantitative RT-PCR of various specimen types is considered the diagnostic gold standard for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, both in terms of sensitivity and specificity. The pre-analytical handling of patient specimens is a critical factor to ensure reliable and valid test results. Therefore, the effect of storage duration and temperature on SARS-CoV-2 RNA copy number stability was examined in various commercially available specimen collection, transport and storage devices for naso/oropharyngeal swabs and saliva. The swab specimen transport and storage devices tested showed no significant alteration of viral RNA copy numbers when stored at room temperature, except for one system when stored for up to 96 h. However, at 37 °C a significant reduction of detectable RNA was found in 3 out of 4 of the swab solutions tested. It was also found that detectability of viral RNA remained unchanged in all 7 saliva devices as well as in unstabilized saliva when stored for 96 h at room temperature, but one device showed marked RNA copy number loss at 37 °C. All tested saliva collection devices inhibited SARS-CoV-2 infectivity immediately, whereas SARS-CoV-2 remained infectious in the swab transport systems examined, which are designed to be used for viral or bacterial growth in cell culture systems.

Indexed as

COVID-19Clinical Laboratory TechniquesCOVID-19 TestingHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2Specimen HandlingRNA, ViralInfectivityPre-analyticRNA stabilitySaliva collection devicesSARS-CoV-2Swab systems

Identifiers

PMID35398581
PMCPMC8990442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.