Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35398414›Full record

ReviewThe Science of the total environment2022

Overcoming challenges due to enhanced biomedical waste generation during COVID-19 pandemic.

Priti Chhanda Ojha, Swati Sucharita Satpathy, Akash Kumar Ojha, Lala Behari Sukla, Debabrata Pradhan

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Science of the total environment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Priti Chhanda OjhaBiofuels and Bioprocessing Research Center, ITER, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar 751030, India; Vasudev Higher Secondary School, Talcher, Angul 759100, India.
Swati Sucharita SatpathyBiofuels and Bioprocessing Research Center, ITER, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar 751030, India.
Akash Kumar OjhaTata Consultancy Services, Bhubaneswar 751024, India.
Lala Behari SuklaBiofuels and Bioprocessing Research Center, ITER, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar 751030, India.
Debabrata PradhanBiofuels and Bioprocessing Research Center, ITER, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar 751030, India. Electronic address: debabratapradhan@soa.ac.in.
Siksha O Anusandhan University · INTata Consultancy Services (India) · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomedical wastes (BMWs) are potentially infectious to the environment and health. They are co-dependent and accumulative during the ongoing coronavirus disease-2019(COVID-19) pandemic. In India the standard treatment processes of BMWs are incineration, autoclaving, shredding, and deep burial; however, incineration and autoclaving are the leading techniques applied by many treatment providers. These conventional treatment methods have several drawbacks in terms of energy, cost, and emission. But the actual problem for the treatment providers is the huge and non-uniform flow of the BMWs during the pandemic. The existing treatment methods are lacking flexibility for the non-uniform flow. The Government of India has provisionally approved some new techniques like plasma pyrolysis, sharp/needle blaster, and PIWS-3000 technologies on a trial basis. But they are all found to be inadequate in the pandemic. Therefore, there is an absolute requirement to micromanage the BMWs based on certain parameters for the possible COVID-19 like pandemic in the future. Segregation is a major step of the BMW management. Its guideline may be shuffled as segregation at the entry points followed by collection instead of the existing system of the collection followed by segregation. Other steps like transportation, location of treatment facilities, upgradation of the existing treatment facilities, and new technologies can solve the challenges up to a certain extent. Technologies like microwave treatment, alkaline hydrolysis, steam sterilization, biological treatment, catalytic solar disinfection, and nanotechnology have a lot of scopes for the treatment of BMWs. Hi-tech approaches in handling and transportation are found to be fruitful in the initial steps of BMW management. End products of the treated BMWs can be potentially fabricated for the application in the built environment. Some policies need to be re-evaluated by the health care facilities or government administrations for efficient BMW management.

Indexed as

COVID-19Medical WasteHumansIncinerationPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Medical WasteBiomedical wastesCOVID-19 pandemicPoliciesTreatment facilitiesUpgrading conventional techniques

Identifiers

PMID35398414
PMCPMC8988481
OpenAlexW4223476976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.