Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35398358›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2022

The dimerization mechanism of the N-terminal domain of spider silk proteins is conserved despite extensive sequence divergence.

Médoune Sarr, Kristine Kitoka, Kellie-Ann Walsh-White, Margit Kaldmäe, Rimants Metlāns, Kaspar Tārs, Alessandro Mantese, Dipen Shah, Michael Landreh, Anna Rising and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Recombinant protein condensation insideMaterials today. Bio · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Médoune SarrDivision for Neurogeriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.
Kristine KitokaDepartment of Physical Organic Chemistry, Latvian Institute of Organic Synthesis, Riga, Latvia.
Kellie-Ann Walsh-WhiteDivision for Neurogeriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.
Margit KaldmäeDepartment of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Rimants MetlānsDepartment of Physical Organic Chemistry, Latvian Institute of Organic Synthesis, Riga, Latvia.
Kaspar TārsLatvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Riga, Latvia.
Alessandro ManteseZoBio BV, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Dipen ShahZoBio BV, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Michael LandrehDepartment of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Anna RisingDepartment of Anatomy, Physiology and Biochemistry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Neo, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.
Jan JohanssonDivision for Neurogeriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden; Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Neo, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.
Kristaps JaudzemsDepartment of Physical Organic Chemistry, Latvian Institute of Organic Synthesis, Riga, Latvia. Electronic address: kristaps.jaudzems@osi.lv.
Nina KronqvistDivision for Neurogeriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden; Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Neo, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden. Electronic address: nina.kronqvist@ki.se.
Karolinska Institutet · SELatvijas Organiskās Sintēzes Institūts · LVLatvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre · LV

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The N-terminal (NT) domain of spider silk proteins (spidroins) is crucial for their storage at high concentrations and also regulates silk assembly. NTs from the major ampullate spidroin (MaSp) and the minor ampullate spidroin are monomeric at neutral pH and confer solubility to spidroins, whereas at lower pH, they dimerize to interconnect spidroins in a fiber. This dimerization is known to result from modulation of electrostatic interactions by protonation of well-conserved glutamates, although it is undetermined if this mechanism applies to other spidroin types as well. Here, we determine the solution and crystal structures of the flagelliform spidroin NT, which shares only 35% identity with MaSp NT, and investigate the mechanisms of its dimerization. We show that flagelliform spidroin NT is structurally similar to MaSp NT and that the electrostatic intermolecular interaction between Asp 40 and Lys 65 residues is conserved. However, the protonation events involve a different set of residues than in MaSp, indicating that an overall mechanism of pH-dependent dimerization is conserved but can be mediated by different pathways in different silk types.

Indexed as

FibroinsSilkSpidersAnimalsConserved SequenceDimerizationHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationProtein DomainsFibroinsSilkdimerizationNMR structureprotein domainsilk assemblyspidroinX-ray structure

Identifiers

PMID35398358
PMCPMC9097459
OpenAlexW4223610786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.