Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35398280›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2022

Dynamics of absolute and relative disparity processing in human visual cortex.

Milena Kaestner, Marissa L Evans, Yulan D Chen, Anthony M Norcia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Spatiotemporal Characteristics of the Stereoscopic Anisotropy.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Milena KaestnerWu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, 290 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Psychology, Stanford University, 450 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford, CA, USA. Electronic address: milenak@stanford.edu.
Marissa L EvansWu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, 290 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Psychology, Stanford University, 450 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford, CA, USA.
Yulan D ChenWu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, 290 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Psychology, Stanford University, 450 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford, CA, USA.
Anthony M NorciaWu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, 290 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Psychology, Stanford University, 450 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford, CA, USA.
Neurosciences Institute · US

Funding

Stanford Vision Research CoreP30EY026877 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey L Goldberg · 2017 to 2026
$8.0M
Disparity processing in visual cortexR01EY018875 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI NORCIA, ANTHONY M · 2008 to 2021
$4.6M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY026877NEI NIH HHS R01 EY018875
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cortical processing of binocular disparity is believed to begin in V1 where cells are sensitive to absolute disparity, followed by the extraction of relative disparity in higher visual areas. While much is known about the cortical distribution and spatial tuning of disparity-selective neurons, the relationship between their spatial and temporal properties is less well understood. Here, we use steady-state Visual Evoked Potentials and dynamic random dot stereograms to characterize the temporal dynamics of spatial mechanisms in human visual cortex that are primarily sensitive to either absolute or relative disparity. Stereograms alternated between disparate and non-disparate states at 2 Hz. By varying the disparity-defined spatial frequency content of the stereograms from a planar surface to corrugated ones, we biased responses towards absolute vs. relative disparities. Reliable Components Analysis was used to derive two dominant sources from the 128 channel EEG records. The first component (RC1) was maximal over the occipital pole. In RC1, first harmonic responses were sustained, tuned for corrugation frequency, and sensitive to the presence of disparity references, consistent with prior psychophysical sensitivity measurements. By contrast, the second harmonic, associated with transient processing, was not spatially tuned and was indifferent to references, consistent with it being generated by an absolute disparity mechanism. Thus, our results reveal a duplex coding strategy in the disparity domain, where relative disparities are computed via sustained mechanisms and absolute disparities are computed via transient mechanisms.

Indexed as

Depth PerceptionVisual CortexEvoked Potentials, VisualHumansPhotic StimulationVision, BinocularVision DisparityBinocular visionDisparitySSVEPSustainedTransient

Identifiers

PMID35398280
PMCPMC9205266
OpenAlexW4225984942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.