Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35397876›Full record

ArticleFertility and sterility2022

Assisted reproductive technology treatment increases obstetric and neonatal risks over that of the underlying infertility diagnosis.

Judy E Stern, Chia-Ling Liu, Xiaohui Cui, Howard J Cabral, Leslie V Farland, Charles Coddington, Hafsatou Diop

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fertility and sterility, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Association between in vitro fertilization and severe neonatal morbidity.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Judy E SternDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pathology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire. Electronic address: judy.e.stern@dartmouth.edu.
Chia-Ling LiuBureau of Family Health and Nutrition, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Xiaohui CuiBureau of Family Health and Nutrition, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Howard J CabralDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Leslie V FarlandDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
Charles CoddingtonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carolinas Medical Center/Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Hafsatou DiopBureau of Family Health and Nutrition, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Massachusetts Department of Public Health · USBoston University · USCarolinas Medical Center · USDartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

Women's Health After Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Population-Based StudyR01HD067270 · NICHD · DARTMOUTH-HITCHCOCK CLINIC · PI DIOP, HAFSATOU, STERN, JUDY E · 2011 to 2020
$7.4M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD067270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment adds obstetric and neonatal risks over and above that of underlying infertility-related diagnoses.

designRetrospective study of linked ART, birth certificate, hospital discharge data, and outpatient insurance claims data in Massachusetts (2013-2017).

settingDatabase. PATIENT(S): Singleton deliveries in women with and without diagnoses of tubal disease, polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), other ovulatory conditions, or endometriosis, identified from the insurance claims and ART data. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): ART and non-ART pregnancy and delivery outcomes were compared with each other and with women with no history of infertility or usage of fertility treatment (fertile group). Generalizing estimating equations with Poisson distribution and exchangeable correlation structure were used to obtain adjusted relative risk ratios (aRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULT(S): Infertility-related diagnoses significantly increased the risks of pregnancy hypertension (PCOS: aRR, 1.13, 95% CI 1.00-1.27), preeclampsia/eclampsia (tubal: aRR 1.28, 95% CI 1.02-1.61; PCOS: aRR 1.23, 95% CI 1.06-1.43; other ovulatory: aRR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.20), gestational diabetes (tubal: aRR 1.28, 95% CI 1.08-1.50; PCOS: aRR 1.58, 95% CI 1.42-1.75; other ovulatory: aRR 1.19, 95% CI 1.12-1.26), and placental problems (tubal aRR 1.47, 95% CI 1.11-1.94), as well as low birthweight and prematurity, compared with deliveries from the fertile group. Within each diagnosis, the use of ART consistently increased the risk of placental problems (aRR 1.49-2.86) but varied for other conditions. CONCLUSION(S): Our study demonstrated that compared with the fertile group, risk was elevated in pregnancies and deliveries from women with tubal, PCOS, other ovulatory, and endometriosis diagnoses who did/did not undergo ART treatment. Placental abnormalities were particularly elevated in ART compared to non-ART deliveries having the same diagnosis.

Indexed as

EndometriosisInfertilityPolycystic Ovary SyndromePremature BirthFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPlacentaPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeReproductive Techniques, AssistedRetrospective StudiesARTinfertility diagnosisIVFobstetric riskplacental problems

Identifiers

PMID35397876
PMCPMC9149058
OpenAlexW4223641307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.