Observational studyInternational journal of hematology2022
The safety and efficacy of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization using biosimilar filgrastim in related donors.
Observational study in International journal of hematology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In April 2014, the Japan Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation started a prospective observational study entitled "A short-term follow-up investigation of related hematopoietic stem cell donors receiving biosimilar G-CSF to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells." A total of 106 donors were registered from 25 transplant facilities through the end of March 2017. The study cohort consisted of 47 men and 58 women, and their median age was 38.5 years (range 15-65 years). The mean total count of collected CD34-positive cells/recipient body weight for all 106 donors was 4.40 ± 2.38 × 10 6/kg. The yield of CD34-positive cells was weakly correlated with donor age was observed. However, gender, WBC count on day 4, G-CSF dose reduction, type of apheresis device, collection speed, and treated blood volume had no significant impact on the collection efficacy of CD34-positive cells. The safety profile of biosimilar G-CSF was also acceptable: 126 adverse events in 73 donors were reported, but none was serious. The most common adverse events were low back pain, headache, and bone pain. This prospective study confirmed that biosimilar G-CSF had comparable efficacy and safety to reference G-CSF for CD34-positive cell mobilization in healthy related donors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.