Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35397737›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of surgical oncology2022

The Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on the Surgical Management of Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Michael P Flood, Joseph C H Kong, Kasmira Wilson, Helen Mohan, Peadar S Waters, Jacob J McCormick, Satish K Warrier, Jeanne Tie, Robert Ramsay, Michael Michael and 1 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Michael P FloodDivision of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia. Michael.flood@petermac.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3532-8343
Joseph C H KongDivision of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Kasmira WilsonDivision of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Helen MohanDivision of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Peadar S WatersDivision of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Jacob J McCormickDivision of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Satish K WarrierDivision of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Jeanne TieSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Robert RamsayDivision of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Michael MichaelSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Alexander G HeriotDivision of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCytoreductive surgery (CRS) with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a well-recognised treatment option for the management of colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM). However, incorporating the routine use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) into this management plan is controversial.

methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on perioperative morbidity and mortality, and long-term survival of patients with CRPM undergoing CRS and HIPEC.

resultsTwelve studies met the inclusion criteria (n = 2,463 patients). Ten were retrospective cohort, one was prospective cohort, and one was a prospective randomised by design. Patients who received NAC followed by CRS and HIPEC experienced no difference in major perioperative morbidity and mortality compared with patients who underwent surgery first (SF). There was no difference in overall survival at 3 years, but at 5 years NAC patients had superior survival (relative risk [RR] 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-1.54, P < 0.001). There were no differences in 1- and 3-year, disease-free survival (DFS) between groups. Study heterogeneity was generally high across all outcome measures.

conclusionsPatients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not experience any increase in perioperative morbidity or mortality. The potential improvement in 5-year overall survival in patients receiving NAC is based on limited confidence due to several limitations in the data, but not sufficiently enough to curtail its use. The practice of NAC in this setting will remain heterogeneous and guided by retrospective evidence until prospective, randomised data are reported.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsHyperthermia, InducedPeritoneal NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCombined Modality TherapyCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID35397737
PMCPMC9492604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.