Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35397721›Full record

ReviewCommunity mental health journal2022

Implementing the Strengths Model of Case Management: Assessing Practice Three Years After Initial Implementation.

Janet Durbin, Tim Aubry, Beverley Barrett, Christiane Bergeron-Leclerc, Catherine Briand, Rick Goscha, Terry Krupa, Jennifer Rae, Maryann Roebuck, Alissa Setliff and 3 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Community mental health journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Janet DurbinCenter for Addictions and Mental Health and Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. janet.durbin@camh.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-9368-818X
Tim AubryDepartment of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Beverley BarrettEastern Health, St. John's, NF, Canada.
Christiane Bergeron-LeclercSchool of Social Work, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Saguenay, Canada.
Catherine BriandUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières and Research Centre of the Montreal Mental Health University Institute, Trois-Rivières, Canada.
Rick GoschaCalifornia Institute for Behavioral Solutions, Sacramento, USA.
Terry KrupaSchool of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Jennifer RaeUniversity of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Maryann RoebuckDepartment of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Alissa SetliffEastern Health, St. John's, NF, Canada.
Jonathan ScacciaDawn Chorus Group, Reading, USA.
Catherine ValléeDepartment of Rehabilitation, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada.
Eric LatimerDouglas Research Centre and Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While strengths approaches are important to recovery-oriented practice, implementation can be challenging. This study implemented the strengths model of case management (SMCM) in 11 CM teams and assessed the fidelity of delivery and staff perceptions of the model after 36 months using the SMCM fidelity scale and the Readiness Monitoring Tool. Paired sample t-tests assessed change in fidelity from baseline to 36 months. Adjusted regression analyses compared survey responses of direct and management staff. While fidelity ratings significantly improved across all domains, at 36 months they remained suboptimal in supervision practices and use of model tools. Staff perceptions were generally positive but consistently lower for front-line than management staff. Implementing SMCM into existing case management practice with good fidelity is feasible. However, clear support from management may strengthen staff motivation and delivery. A review of practice later in implementation can flag challenges for sustainability and guide implementation support.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersCase ManagementHumansMotivationSurveys and QuestionnairesCase managementFidelityImplementationStrengths approach

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.