ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2022
An overview of SNP-SNP microhaplotypes in the 26 populations of the 1000 Genomes Project.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Bibliometric analysis of kinship analysis from 1960 to 2023: global trends and development.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Pooled it
- Development and Evaluation of a Novel Microhaplotype Panel for DNA Mixture and Kinship Analysis.Electrophoresis · 2026Article
- Article
- State of the Art for Microhaplotypes.Genes · 2022Article
- An Application of ITO Analysis in Secondary Kinship Identification.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microhaplotypes (MHs) are a promising new type of forensic markers that are defined by the combinations of two- or more single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within 200 bp. Their advantages, such as low mutation rates, lack of stutter artifacts, and short amplicons, have improved human identification, kinship analysis, ancestry prediction, and mixture deconvolution capabilities. Information on published MHs, e.g., allele frequencies, is available in widely used public databases, ALlele FREquency Database, and MicroHapDB. However, there are abundant non-published MHs spread over the whole genome, and those databases do not incorporate other databases (e.g., the SNP Database) to provide users with more integrated information. Therefore, it is essential to establish a robust, responsive, and comprehensive MHs database. In this study, we thoroughly screened for SNP-SNP MHs among 26 populations from the 1000 Genomes Project (Phase 3). All genotype data of SNPs in each MH were converted to PHASE input files, and allele frequencies were estimated using PHASE. We compiled a detailed summary of SNP-SNPs at the global, continental, and population levels focused on haplotypes and the A
Indexed as
Identifiers
35397682What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.