Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35397664›Full record

ArticleCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2022

Population pharmacokinetics of rucaparib in patients with advanced ovarian cancer or other solid tumors.

Michelle L Green, Shu Chin Ma, Sandra Goble, Heidi Giordano, Lara Maloney, Andrew D Simmons, Jeri Beltman, Thomas C Harding, Jim J Xiao

5 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01009190 phase1completednot on this map

A Parallel Arms Phase 1 Safety, Pharmacokinetic And Pharmacodynamic Study Of The Intravenous Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase (PARP) Inhibitor PF-01367338 (AG-014699) In Combination With Several Chemotherapeutic Regimens In Adult Patients With Advanced Solid Tumor

TypeinterventionalSponsorpharmaand GmbHRan2010 to 2014Enrolled85ConditionsAdvanced Solid TumorsArmsPF-01367338, Carboplatin
NCT01482715 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

A Phase I/II, Open-Label, Safety, Pharmacokinetic, and Preliminary Efficacy Study of Oral Rucaparib in Patients With gBRCA Mutation Ovarian Cancer or Other Solid Tumor

TypeinterventionalSponsorpharmaand GmbHRan2011 to 2019Enrolled136ConditionsOvarian Cancer, Fallopian Tube Cancer, Peritoneal Cancer, Advanced Solid Tumor With Evidence of Germline or Somatic BRCAArmsRucaparib
NCT01891344 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase 2, Open-Label Study of Rucaparib in Patients With Platinum-Sensitive, Relapsed, High-Grade Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer (ARIEL2)

TypeinterventionalSponsorpharmaand GmbHRan2013 to 2021Enrolled491ConditionsOvarian Cancer, Epithelial Ovarian Cancer, Fallopian Tube Cancer, Peritoneal CancerArmsOral rucaparib
NCT01968213 phase3completednot on this map

A Study of Rucaparib as Switch Maintenance Following Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Patients With Platinum-Sensitive, High-Grade Serous or Endometrioid Epithelial Ovarian, Primary Peritoneal or Fallopian Tube Cancer ( ARIEL3 )

TypeinterventionalSponsorpharmaand GmbHRan2014 to 2022Enrolled564ConditionsOvarian Cancer, Fallopian Tube Cancer, Peritoneal CancerArmsRucaparib, Placebo
NCT02952534 phase2completednot on this map

TRITON2: A Multicenter, Open-label Phase 2 Study of Rucaparib in Patients With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Associated With Homologous Recombination Deficiency

TypeinterventionalSponsorpharmaand GmbHRan2017 to 2021Enrolled277ConditionsMetastatic Castration Resistant Prostate CancerArmsRucaparib
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle L GreenCertara Strategic Consulting, Menlo Park, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7367-9040
Shu Chin MaCertara Strategic Consulting, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Sandra GobleClovis Oncology, Inc., 5500 Flatiron Pkwy, Boulder, CO, 80301, USA.
Heidi GiordanoClovis Oncology, Inc., 5500 Flatiron Pkwy, Boulder, CO, 80301, USA.
Lara MaloneyClovis Oncology, Inc., 5500 Flatiron Pkwy, Boulder, CO, 80301, USA.
Andrew D SimmonsClovis Oncology, Inc., 5500 Flatiron Pkwy, Boulder, CO, 80301, USA.
Jeri BeltmanClovis Oncology, Inc., 5500 Flatiron Pkwy, Boulder, CO, 80301, USA.
Thomas C HardingClovis Oncology, Inc., 5500 Flatiron Pkwy, Boulder, CO, 80301, USA.
Jim J XiaoClovis Oncology, Inc., 5500 Flatiron Pkwy, Boulder, CO, 80301, USA. jxiao@clovisoncology.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3632-2012
Clovis Oncology (United States) · USCertara (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop a population pharmacokinetics (PPK) model for rucaparib, an oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor.

methodsThe PPK analysis used PK data from patients in Study 1014 (NCT01009190, n = 35), Study 10 (NCT01482715, n = 123), and ARIEL2 (NCT01891344, n = 300), including intensive intravenous data (12-40 mg), intensive and sparse oral data (12-360 mg single-dose, 40-500 mg once daily, and 240-840 mg twice daily [BID]), and intensive single-dose oral data under fasted conditions and after a high-fat meal (40, 300, and 600 mg).

resultsRucaparib PK was well described by a two-compartment model with sequential zero-order release and first-order absorption and first-order elimination. A high-fat meal slightly increased bioavailability at 600 mg but not at lower doses; this is not considered clinically significant, and rucaparib can be taken with or without food. Covariate effects of baseline creatinine clearance and albumin on rucaparib clearance were identified. Despite numerical increases in exposure with renal impairment, no dose adjustment is recommended for patients with mild or moderate renal impairment. No statistically significant relationships were detected for demographics, hepatic function (normal versus mild impairment), CYP1A2 and CYP2D6 phenotypes, or strong CYP1A2 or CYP2D6 inhibitors. Concomitant proton pump inhibitors showed no clinically significant effect on absorption. External validation of the model with data from ARIEL3 (NCT01968213) and TRITON2 (NCT02952534) studies showed no clinically meaningful PK differences across indications or sex.

conclusionThe PPK model adequately described rucaparib PK, and none of the covariates evaluated had a clinically relevant effect. CLINICALTRIALS: GOV: Study 1014 (NCT01009190), Study 10 (NCT01482715), ARIEL2 (NCT01891344), ARIEL3 (NCT01968213), and TRITON2 (NCT02952534).

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsOvarian NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialClinical Studies as TopicCytochrome P-450 CYP1A2FemaleHumansIndolesPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsAntineoplastic AgentsCytochrome P-450 CYP1A2IndolesPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsrucaparibPoly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitorPopulation pharmacokineticsRucaparibSolid tumors

Identifiers

PMID35397664
OpenAlexW4223562002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.