Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35397574›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2022

Feasibility and implementation fidelity of a co-designed intervention to promote in-hospital mobility among older medical patients-the WALK-Copenhagen project (WALK-Cph).

Britt Stævnsbo Pedersen, Jeanette Wassar Kirk, Maren Kathrine Olesen, Birk Mygind Grønfeldt, Nina Thórný Stefánsdóttir, Rasmus Brødsgaard, Tine Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, Per Nilsen, Ove Andersen, Thomas Bandholm and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03825497 (WALK-Copenhagen), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03825497 naterminatednot on this map

WALK-Copenhagen (WALK-Cph): Promoting Physical Activity in Older Adults During Hospitalization and After Discharge

TypeinterventionalSponsorCopenhagen University Hospital, HvidovreRan2018 to 2019Enrolled18ConditionsHospitalization, ActivityArmsPromotion of activity during and after hospitalization
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Britt Stævnsbo PedersenDepartment of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegård Alle 30, Hvidovre, 2650, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jeanette Wassar KirkDepartment of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegård Alle 30, Hvidovre, 2650, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Maren Kathrine OlesenDepartment of Endocrinology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Denmark.
Birk Mygind GrønfeldtDepartment of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegård Alle 30, Hvidovre, 2650, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nina Thórný StefánsdóttirDepartment of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegård Alle 30, Hvidovre, 2650, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rasmus BrødsgaardDepartment of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegård Alle 30, Hvidovre, 2650, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Tine Tjørnhøj-ThomsenNational Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Per NilsenDepartment of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Ove AndersenDepartment of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegård Alle 30, Hvidovre, 2650, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Thomas BandholmDepartment of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegård Alle 30, Hvidovre, 2650, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mette Merete PedersenDepartment of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegård Alle 30, Hvidovre, 2650, Copenhagen, Denmark. mette.merete.pedersen@regionh.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5719-2531

Funding

Danske Fysioterapeuter PD-2018-30-10Region Hovedstaden P-2018-2-11Velux Fonden F-21835-01-04-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMobility interventions can prevent functional decline among older patients, but implementation of such interventions may be complicated by barriers in the clinical setting. The WALK-Copenhagen project (WALK-Cph) is aimed at promoting a 24-h mobility among older medical patients during hospitalization. The WALK-Cph intervention was co-designed by researchers and stakeholders to tailor the intervention to the clinical context. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and implementation fidelity of the WALK-Cph intervention before evaluating clinical effectiveness in a randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03825497).

methodsThe WALK-Cph intervention consisted of six components: a welcome folder explaining the importance of in-hospital activity, a WALK-plan prescribing up to three daily walking sessions during and after hospitalization, a WALK-path in the hallway that patients were motivated to use daily, exercise posters in the hallways and bedrooms, self-service on beverages and clothes, and discharge with a WALK-plan. The present study reports on phase 2 of WALK-Cph and consists of a feasibility and a fidelity component. The study was conducted at the two WALK-Cph intervention departments after the initiation of the WALK-Cph intervention. A cohort of older medical patients (+65) was recruited for the feasibility study to assess recruitment and data collection procedures and the method for assessment of activity. Simultaneously, implementation fidelity was assessed by observing clinical practice and intervention delivery at the intervention departments.

resultsA feasibility cohort of 48 patients was included. Inclusion was considered feasible with recruitment rates between 62% and 70% of all eligible patients. Also, data collection was conducted without obstacles, and all patients accepted to wear activity monitors. The fidelity observations showed that three of the six intervention components were partially implemented as planned whereas three components were not implemented as planned.

conclusionThe WALK-Cph intervention was found feasible, and although the intervention was not implemented with fidelity, the level of fidelity was considered sufficient to continue with further testing of the WALK-Cph intervention in a large-scale trial.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03825497 (retrospectively registered). Protocol PubMed ID (PMID): 29523569.

Indexed as

AccelerometersCo-designFeasibility and fidelityImplementationMobilityOlder medical patients

Identifiers

PMID35397574
PMCPMC8994315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.