Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35397525›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2022

Using multiple imputation and intervention-based scenarios to project the mobility of older adults.

Jukka Kontto, Laura Paalanen, Reijo Sund, Päivi Sainio, Seppo Koskinen, Panayotes Demakakos, Hanna Tolonen, Tommi Härkänen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jukka KonttoDepartment of Public Health and Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), P.O. Box 30, FI-00271, Helsinki, Finland. jukka.kontto@thl.fi.ORCID 0000-0003-3899-9852
Laura PaalanenDepartment of Public Health and Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), P.O. Box 30, FI-00271, Helsinki, Finland.
Reijo SundInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Päivi SainioDepartment of Public Health and Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), P.O. Box 30, FI-00271, Helsinki, Finland.
Seppo KoskinenDepartment of Public Health and Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), P.O. Box 30, FI-00271, Helsinki, Finland.
Panayotes DemakakosDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK.
Hanna TolonenDepartment of Public Health and Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), P.O. Box 30, FI-00271, Helsinki, Finland.
Tommi HärkänenDepartment of Public Health and Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), P.O. Box 30, FI-00271, Helsinki, Finland.
Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FIUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Eastern Finland · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProjections of the development of mobility limitations of older adults are needed for evidence-based policy making. The aim of this study was to generate projections of mobility limitations among older people in the United States, England, and Finland.

methodsWe applied multiple imputation modelling with bootstrapping to generate projections of stair climbing and walking limitations until 2026. A physical activity intervention producing a beneficial effect on self-reported activities of daily living measures was identified in a comprehensive literature search and incorporated in the scenarios used in the projections. We utilised the harmonised longitudinal survey data from the Ageing Trajectories of Health - Longitudinal Opportunities and Synergies (ATHLOS) project (N = 24,982).

resultsBased on the scenarios from 2012 to 2026, the prevalence of walking limitations will decrease from 9.4 to 6.4%. A physical activity intervention would decrease the prevalence of stair climbing limitations compared with no intervention from 28.9 to 18.9% between 2012 and 2026.

conclusionsA physical activity intervention implemented on older population seems to have a positive effect on maintaining mobility in the future. Our method provides an interesting option for generating projections by incorporating intervention-based scenarios.

Indexed as

Healthy AgingMobility LimitationActivities of Daily LivingAgedExerciseHumansWalkingMobility limitationsMultiple imputationOlder adultsProjectionRandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID35397525
PMCPMC8994920
OpenAlexW4223588041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.