Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35397505›Full record

SynthesisBMC gastroenterology2022

The role of faecal calprotectin in diagnosis and staging of colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Fiona A Ross, James H Park, David Mansouri, Emilie Combet, Paul G Horgan, Donald C McMillan, Campbell S D Roxburgh

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC gastroenterology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Colonic neoplasia and celiac disease: A systematic review.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fiona A RossAcademic Unit of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Level 2, New Lister Building, 10-16 Alexandra Parade, Glasgow, G31 2ER, UK. fiona.ross23@nhs.scot.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2766-6705
James H ParkAcademic Unit of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Level 2, New Lister Building, 10-16 Alexandra Parade, Glasgow, G31 2ER, UK.
David MansouriAcademic Unit of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Level 2, New Lister Building, 10-16 Alexandra Parade, Glasgow, G31 2ER, UK.
Emilie CombetAcademic Unit of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Level 2, New Lister Building, 10-16 Alexandra Parade, Glasgow, G31 2ER, UK.
Paul G HorganAcademic Unit of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Level 2, New Lister Building, 10-16 Alexandra Parade, Glasgow, G31 2ER, UK.
Donald C McMillanAcademic Unit of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Level 2, New Lister Building, 10-16 Alexandra Parade, Glasgow, G31 2ER, UK.
Campbell S D RoxburghAcademic Unit of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Level 2, New Lister Building, 10-16 Alexandra Parade, Glasgow, G31 2ER, UK.
Glasgow Royal Infirmary · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe presence of inflammation is a key hallmark of cancer and, plays an important role in disease progression and survival in colorectal cancer (CRC). Calprotectin detected in the faeces is a sensitive measure of colonic inflammation. The role of FC as a diagnostic test that may categorise patients by risk of neoplasia is poorly defined. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to characterise the relationship between elevations of FC and colorectal neoplasia.

methodsA systematic review was performed using the keywords (MESH terms) and a statistical and meta-analysis was performed.

resultsA total of 35 studies are included in this review. CRC patients are more likely than controls to have an elevated FC OR 5.19, 95% CI 3.12-8.62, p < 0.001 with a heterogeneity (I

conclusionFC levels are significantly higher in CRC, with high sensitivity. Its low specificity prevents it from being used to diagnose or screen for CRC.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsLeukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexFecesHumansInflammationSensitivity and SpecificityLeukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexColorectal cancerFaecal calprotectinNeoplasia

Identifiers

PMID35397505
PMCPMC8994317
OpenAlexW4223546529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.