Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35397477›Full record

ReviewCancer discovery2022

Somatic Mutation: What Shapes the Mutational Landscape of Normal Epithelia?

Joanna C Fowler, Philip H Jones

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer discovery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Stem cell competition.Current topics in developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. CD103Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Joanna C FowlerWellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom.
Philip H JonesWellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5904-795X
University of Cambridge · GBWellcome Sanger Institute · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK A27326Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epithelial stem cells accumulate mutations throughout life. Some of these mutants increase competitive fitness and may form clones that colonize the stem cell niche and persist to acquire further genome alterations. After a transient expansion, mutant stem cells must revert to homeostatic behavior so normal tissue architecture is maintained. Some positively selected mutants may promote cancer development, whereas others inhibit carcinogenesis. Factors that shape the mutational landscape include wild-type and mutant stem cell dynamics, competition for the niche, and environmental exposures. Understanding these processes may give new insight into the basis of cancer risk and opportunities for cancer prevention. SIGNIFICANCE: Recent advances in sequencing have found somatic mutations in all epithelial tissues studied to date. Here we review how the mutational landscape of normal epithelia is shaped by clonal competition within the stem cell niche combined with environmental exposures. Some of the selected mutant genes are oncogenic, whereas others may be inhibitory of transformation. Discoveries in this area leave many open questions, such as the definition of cancer driver genes, the mechanisms by which tissues constrain a high proportion of oncogenic mutant cells, and whether clonal fitness can be modulated to decrease cancer risk.

Indexed as

CarcinogenesisNeoplasmsClone CellsEpitheliumHumansMutation

Identifiers

PMID35397477
PMCPMC7613026
OpenAlexW4223429609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.