Trial reportESMO open2022
Efficacy and safety of avelumab plus axitinib in elderly patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: extended follow-up results from JAVELIN Renal 101.
Trial report in ESMO open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated toxicities in older adults with cancer: recommendations from the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG).The Lancet. Oncology · 2025Guideline
- Sintilimab Plus Axitinib for Advanced Fumarate Hydratase-Deficient Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Phase 2 Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.JAMA oncology · 2025Trial
- Efficacy, safety, and treatment feasibility of pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib in patients aged 75 years or older with advanced renal cell carcinoma: a Japanese multicenter retrospective study.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
- First-Line Therapy for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: Score-Matched Analysis of Dual Combination Immunotherapy versus Combination of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Immunotherapy in the TOURS Multicenter Study.Targeted oncology · 2026Article
- Melanoma: Pathogenesis and Targeted Therapy.MedComm · 2026Review
- One size does not fit all: rethinking IO-TKI use in favorable-risk metastatic ccRCC.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Dual Pathway Inhibition in Patients With mRCC: A Case Series From Kuwait Highlighting the Role of Avelumab and Axitinib.Case reports in oncological medicine · 2026Article
- First-Line Treatment Strategies in IMDC Favourable-Risk Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.Oncology research · 2026Review
- Real-world efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus cabozantinib in octogenarian patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.International urology and nephrology · 2025Article
- Real-world outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor-based combination therapy in older adult patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a multi-center, retrospective analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Real-world outcomes of avelumab plus axitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma in Japan: long-term follow-up from the J-DART2 retrospective study.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Observational
- Avelumab + axitinib treatment in older patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma in Japan: Subgroup analyses of post-marketing surveillance data by age.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Final Analysis of Post-Marketing Surveillance for Avelumab + Axitinib in Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma in Japan.Cancer medicine · 2025Observational
- Clinical outcomes of first-line combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitor for metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study in Japan.International journal of clinical oncology · 2024Article
- Inclusion, characteristics, and reporting of older adults in FDA registration studies of immunotherapy, 2018-2022.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2024Review
- Antiangiogenic-immune-checkpoint inhibitor combinations: lessons from phase III clinical trials.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2024Review
- Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Geriatric Oncology.Current oncology reports · 2024Review
- Rationale for immune checkpoint inhibitors plus targeted therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Real-world outcomes of avelumab plus axitinib as first-line therapy in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma in Japan: A multicenter, retrospective, observational study (J-DART).International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 11 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn the phase III JAVELIN Renal 101 trial, first-line avelumab plus axitinib demonstrated a progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) benefit versus sunitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). However, efficacy in elderly patients remains unclear. We report efficacy and safety by age group from the second interim analysis of overall survival (OS). PATIENTS AND
methodsPFS and ORR as per blinded independent central review (RECIST 1.1), OS, and safety were assessed in patient groups aged <65, ≥65 to <75, and ≥75 years.
resultsIn the avelumab plus axitinib and sunitinib arms, 271/138/33 and 275/128/41 patients aged <65, ≥65 to <75, and ≥75 years, respectively, were randomized. At data cut-off (January 2019), median PFS [95% confidence interval (CI)] with avelumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib in these respective age groups was 11.6 (8.4-19.4) versus 6.9 (5.6-8.4) months [hazard ratio (HR), 0.63; 95% CI 0.501-0.786], 13.8 (11.1-18.0) versus 11.0 (7.8-16.6) months (HR, 0.88; 95% CI 0.627-1.231), and 13.8 [7.0-not estimable (NE)] versus 9.8 (4.3-NE) months (HR, 0.76; 95% CI 0.378-1.511). Median OS (95% CI) in the respective age groups was not reached (NR) (NE-NE) versus 28.6 (25.5-NE) months (HR, 0.74; 95% CI 0.541-1.022), 30.0 (30.0-NE) versus NR (NE-NE) months (HR, 0.89; 95% CI 0.546-1.467), and 25.3 (19.9-NE) versus NR (19.4-NE) months (HR, 0.87; 95% CI 0.359-2.106). ORR (95% CI) in the respective age groups was 49.4% (43.3% to 55.6%) versus 27.3% (22.1% to 32.9%), 60.9% (52.2% to 69.1%) versus 28.9% (21.2% to 37.6%), and 42.4% (25.5% to 60.8%) versus 22.0% (10.6% to 37.6%). In the avelumab plus axitinib arm, grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) and immune-related AEs occurred in 76.9%/81.2%/72.7% and 45.5%/48.1%/36.4% in the respective age groups.
conclusionsFirst-line avelumab plus axitinib demonstrated favorable efficacy across age groups, including patients aged ≥75 years. OS data were still immature; follow-up is ongoing. The safety profile was generally consistent across age groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.