Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35397225›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Planetary health2022

Economics for people and planet-moving beyond the neoclassical paradigm.

Lina Brand-Correa, Anna Brook, Milena Büchs, Petra Meier, Yannish Naik, Daniel W O'Neill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Planetary health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The Conditions for a Path Beyond Capitalism Comment on "Can a Well-Being Economy Save Us?"International journal of health policy and management · 2025
    Article
  8. A one health economy.Global bioethics = Problemi di bioetica · 2025
    Article
  9. Health Economics in a World of Uneconomic Growth.Applied health economics and health policy · 2024
    Article
  10. Strengthening the European Semester to Achieve Economies of Wellbeing.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. What needs to happen to 'level up' public health?Contemporary social science · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lina Brand-CorreaFaculty of Environmental and Urban Change, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Anna BrookSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. Electronic address: anna.brook@sheffield.ac.uk.
Milena BüchsSustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Petra MeierMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Yannish NaikSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK; Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Daniel W O'NeillSustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office SPHSU 20Chief Scientist Office SPHSU20Medical Research Council MC_UU_00022/5Medical Research Council MR/S037578/1Medical Research Council MR/S037578/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite substantial attention within the fields of public and planetary health on developing an economic system that benefits both people's health and the environment, heterodox economic schools of thought have received little attention within these fields. Ecological economics is a school of thought with particular relevance to public and planetary health. In this article, we discuss implications of key ecological economics ideas for public and planetary health, especially those related to critiques of gross domestic product as a measure of progress and economic growth as the dominant goal for economic and policy decision making. We suggest that ecological economics aligns well with public health goals, including concern for equality and redistribution. Ecological economics offers an opportunity to make the transition to an economic system that is designed to promote human and planetary health from the outset, rather than one where social and environmental externalities must be constantly corrected after the fact. Important ideas from ecological economics include the use of a multidimensional framework to evaluate economic and social performance, the prioritisation of wellbeing and environmental goals in decision making, policy design and evaluation that take complex relationships into account, and the role of provisioning systems (the physical and social systems that link resource use and social outcomes). We discuss possible interventions at the national scale that could promote public health and that align with the prioritisation of social and ecological objectives, including universal basic income or services and sovereign money creation. Overall, we lay the foundations for additional integration of ecological economics principles and pluralist economic thinking into public and planetary health scholarship and practice.

Indexed as

Economic DevelopmentPlanetsHumansPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID35397225
PMCPMC9226380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.