ArticleThe Lancet. Planetary health2022
Economics for people and planet-moving beyond the neoclassical paradigm.
Article in The Lancet. Planetary health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Assessing the effects of population-level political, economic and social exposures, interventions and policies on inclusive economy outcomes for health equity in high-income countries: a systematic review of reviews.Systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Creating a healthier economy: A rapid evidence review of inequalities in flexible working arrangements in the UK.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2025Review
- Grain fields in sea-landscapes.Ambio · 2025Article
- Policy principles for sustainable and just land systems.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Review
- Impact of low-carbon economic policies on the corporate environmental responsibility model in China.PloS one · 2025Article
- The Conditions for a Path Beyond Capitalism Comment on "Can a Well-Being Economy Save Us?"International journal of health policy and management · 2025Article
- A one health economy.Global bioethics = Problemi di bioetica · 2025Article
- Health Economics in a World of Uneconomic Growth.Applied health economics and health policy · 2024Article
- Strengthening the European Semester to Achieve Economies of Wellbeing.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- Post-growth economics: a must for planetary health justice.Globalization and health · 2023Article
- What needs to happen to 'level up' public health?Contemporary social science · 2023Article
- Envisioning environmental equity: climate change, health, and racial justice.Lancet (London, England) · 2023Review
- Environmental impact assessment in health technology assessment: principles, approaches, and challenges.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2023Article
- Is Economic Growth Good for Population Health? A Critical Review.Canadian studies in population · 2023Review
- Breaking free from tunnel vision for climate change and health.PLOS global public health · 2023Review
- What's to Eat and Drink on Campus? Public and Planetary Health, Public Higher Education, and the Public Good.Nutrients · 2022Article
- Health professional and public perspectives on environmentally sustainable healthcare in Trinidad and Tobago.The journal of climate change and healthArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite substantial attention within the fields of public and planetary health on developing an economic system that benefits both people's health and the environment, heterodox economic schools of thought have received little attention within these fields. Ecological economics is a school of thought with particular relevance to public and planetary health. In this article, we discuss implications of key ecological economics ideas for public and planetary health, especially those related to critiques of gross domestic product as a measure of progress and economic growth as the dominant goal for economic and policy decision making. We suggest that ecological economics aligns well with public health goals, including concern for equality and redistribution. Ecological economics offers an opportunity to make the transition to an economic system that is designed to promote human and planetary health from the outset, rather than one where social and environmental externalities must be constantly corrected after the fact. Important ideas from ecological economics include the use of a multidimensional framework to evaluate economic and social performance, the prioritisation of wellbeing and environmental goals in decision making, policy design and evaluation that take complex relationships into account, and the role of provisioning systems (the physical and social systems that link resource use and social outcomes). We discuss possible interventions at the national scale that could promote public health and that align with the prioritisation of social and ecological objectives, including universal basic income or services and sovereign money creation. Overall, we lay the foundations for additional integration of ecological economics principles and pluralist economic thinking into public and planetary health scholarship and practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.