Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35397166›Full record

ReviewJapanese journal of clinical oncology2022

Overview of clinical management for older patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Kazuyuki Numakura, Yasutomo Nakai, Takahiro Kojima, Takahiro Osawa, Shintaro Narita, Masashi Nakayama, Hiroshi Kitamura, Hiroyuki Nishiyama, Nobuo Shinohara

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Kazuyuki NumakuraDepartment of Urology, Akita University, Akita, Japan.
Yasutomo NakaiDepartment of Urology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Takahiro KojimaDepartment of Urology, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4150-9631
Takahiro OsawaDepartment of Urology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4444-7958
Shintaro NaritaDepartment of Urology, Akita University, Akita, Japan.
Masashi NakayamaDepartment of Urology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroshi KitamuraDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Hiroyuki NishiyamaDepartment of Urology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan.
Nobuo ShinoharaDepartment of Urology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Akita University · JPHokkaido University Hospital · JPOsaka International Cancer Institute · JPAichi Cancer Center · JPUniversity of Toyama · JPUniversity of Tsukuba Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapidly increasing pool of older patients being diagnosed with and surviving their cancer is creating many challenges. Regarding localized renal cell carcinoma, surgery is considered as gold standard treatment options even in older men, whereas active surveillance and ablation therapy are alternative options for a proportion of these patients. With regard to advanced disease, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKI) and immune check point inhibitor are standard treatment modalities, although treatment choice from multiple regimens and prevention of adverse events need to be considered. Better assessment techniques, such as comprehensive geriatric assessment to meet the unique needs of older patients, are a central focus in the delivery of high-quality geriatric oncology care. Through this process, shared decision-making should be adopted in clinical care to achieve optimal goals of care that reflect patient and caregiver hopes, needs and preferences. It is necessary to continue investigating oncological outcomes and complications associated with treatment in this population to ensure appropriate cancer care. In this narrative review, we completed a literature review of the various treatments for renal cell carcinoma in older patients that aimed to identify the current evidence related to the full range of the treatments including active surveillance, surgery, ablation therapy and systemic therapy. Prospectively designed studies and studies regarding geriatric assessment were preferentially added as references. Our goals were to summarize the real-world evidence and provide a decision framework that guides better cancer practices for older patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsAgedHumansMaleProtein-Tyrosine KinasesProtein-Tyrosine Kinasesablation therapyactive surveillanceolder patientsrenal cell carcinomasurgerysystemic therapy

Identifiers

PMID35397166
OpenAlexW4223594476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.