ReviewDrugs2022
Pharmacotherapeutic Treatment of Glioblastoma: Where Are We to Date?
Review in Drugs, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antitumor effects of the novel docetaxel derivative JJH201601 in glioma: targeting ribosome biogenesis and enhancing temozolomide sensitivity.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Amlodipine exerts inhibitory effects against glioma stem cells through degrading EGFR and down-regulating its downstream pro-survival pathways.Cell death discovery · 2025Article
- Application Value and Research Frontiers of Immunotherapy in Glioblastoma: A Bibliometric and Visualized Analysis.Oncology research · 2025Review
- Targeting Mitochondria in Glioma: New Hopes for a Cure.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- MiR-155-5p regulates autophagy and apoptosis of glioma cells through RICTOR.Translational cancer research · 2024Article
- Roles of lncRNA-MALAT1 in the Progression and Prognosis of Gliomas.Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry · 2024Review
- The peritumoral edema index and related mechanisms influence the prognosis of GBM patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Review
- Dual blockade of EGFR and PI3K signaling pathways offers a therapeutic strategy for glioblastoma.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2023Article
- RNA-binding protein DHX9 promotes glioma growth and tumor-associated macrophages infiltration via TCF12.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2023Article
- Review
- CAR-T cells neurotoxicity from consolidated practice in hematological malignancies to fledgling experience in CNS tumors: fill the gap.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Combining single-cell sequencing and spatial transcriptome sequencing to identify exosome-related features of glioblastoma and constructing a prognostic model to identify BARD1 as a potential therapeutic target for GBM patients.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- EGFR alterations in glioblastoma play a role in antitumor immunity regulation.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Review
- Involvement of Resveratrol against Brain Cancer: A Combination Strategy with a Pharmaceutical Approach.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Therapeutic Options in Neuro-Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Tumor-Associated Microenvironment of Adult Gliomas: A Review.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Neutrophils: New Critical Regulators of Glioma.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The clinical management of glioblastoma (GBM) is still bereft of treatments able to significantly improve the poor prognosis of the disease. Despite the extreme clinical need for novel therapeutic drugs, only a small percentage of patients with GBM benefit from inclusion in a clinical trial. Moreover, often clinical studies do not lead to final interpretable conclusions. From the mistakes and negative results obtained in the last years, we are now able to plan a novel generation of clinical studies for patients with GBM, allowing the testing of multiple anticancer agents at the same time. This assumes critical importance, considering that, thanks to improved knowledge of altered molecular mechanisms related to the disease, we are now able to propose several potential effective compounds in patients with both newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM. Among the novel compounds assessed, the initially great enthusiasm toward trials employing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) was disappointing due to the negative results that emerged in three randomized phase III trials. However, novel biological insights into the disease suggest that immunotherapy can be a convincing and effective treatment in GBM even if ICIs failed to prolong the survival of these patients. In this regard, the most promising approach consists of engineered immune cells such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T, CAR M, and CAR NK alone or in combination with other treatments. In this review, we discuss several issues related to systemic treatments in GBM patients. First, we assess critical issues toward the planning of clinical trials and the strategies employed to overcome these obstacles. We then move on to the most relevant interventional studies carried out on patients with previously untreated (newly diagnosed) GBM and those with recurrent and pretreated disease. Finally, we investigate novel immunotherapeutic approaches with special emphasis on preclinical and clinical data related to the administration of engineered immune cells in GBM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.