Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35396978›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2022

Early stage breast cancer follow-up in real-world clinical practice: the added value of cell free circulating tumor DNA.

E La Rocca, M C De Santis, M Silvestri, E Ortolan, M Valenti, S Folli, F G de Braud, G V Bianchi, G P Scaperrotta, G Apolone and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

E La Rocca *Breast Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
M C De SantisBreast Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
M Silvestri *Biomarkers Unit, Department of Applied Research and Technological Development, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
E OrtolanBiomarkers Unit, Department of Applied Research and Technological Development, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
M ValentiBiomarkers Unit, Department of Applied Research and Technological Development, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
S FolliBreast Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
F G de BraudBreast Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
G V BianchiBreast Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
G P ScaperrottaBreast Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
G ApoloneScientific Directorate, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
M G DaidoneScientific Directorate, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
V CappellettiBiomarkers Unit, Department of Applied Research and Technological Development, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
G Pruneri *Breast Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
S Di Cosimo *Biomarkers Unit, Department of Applied Research and Technological Development, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy. serena.dicosimo@istitutotumori.mi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4666-8052
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePhysical examinations and annual mammography (minimal follow-up) are as effective as laboratory/imaging tests (intensive follow-up) in detecting breast cancer (BC) recurrence. This statement is now challenged by the availability of new diagnostic tools for asymptomatic cases. Herein, we analyzed current practices and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in monitoring high-risk BC patients treated with curative intent in a comprehensive cancer center. PATIENTS AND

methodsForty-two consecutive triple negative BC patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy and surgery were prospectively enrolled. Data from plasma samples and surveillance procedures were analyzed to report the diagnostic pattern of relapsed cases, i.e., by symptoms, follow-up procedures and ctDNA.

resultsBesides minimal follow-up, 97% and 79% of patients had at least 1 non-recommended imaging and laboratory tests for surveillance purposes. During a median follow-up of 5.1(IQR, 4.1-5.9) years, 13 events occurred (1 contralateral BC, 1 loco-regional recurrence, 10 metastases, and 1 death). Five recurrent cases were diagnosed by intensive follow-up, 5 by symptoms, and 2 incidentally. ctDNA antedated disseminated disease in all evaluable cases excepted two with bone-only and single liver metastases. The mean time from ctDNA detection to suspicious findings at follow-up imaging was 3.81(SD, 2.68), and to definitive recurrence diagnosis 8(SD, 2.98) months. ctDNA was undetectable in the absence of disease and in two suspected cases not subsequently confirmed.

conclusionsSome relapses are still symptomatic despite the extensive use of intensive follow-up. ctDNA is a specific test, sensitive enough to detect recurrence before other methods, suitable for clarifying equivocal imaging, and exploitable for salvage therapy in asymptomatic BC survivors.

Indexed as

Circulating Tumor DNATriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorFollow-Up StudiesHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNABreast cancerCirculating tumor DNAFollow-upImaging

Identifiers

PMID35396978
PMCPMC9114063
OpenAlexW4223638095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.