Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35396963›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

Variation over time of the factors influencing return to work and work capacities after a diagnosis of breast cancer: a study on the behalf of the Seintinelles research network.

Delphine Hequet, Anne-Sophie Hamy, Noemie Girard, Enora Laas, Florence Coussy, Roman Rouzier, Marie Preau, Lidia Delrieu, Agnes Dumas, Fabien Reyal

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prognostic factors for return to work in breast cancer survivors.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Returning to Work after Breast Cancer: A One-Year Mixed-Methods Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The role of physical arm function and demographic disparities in breast cancer survivors' ability to return to work.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Delphine HequetDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France. delphine.hequet@curie.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8926-5651
Anne-Sophie HamyDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Noemie GirardDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Enora LaasDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Florence CoussyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Roman RouzierDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Marie PreauSocial Psychology Research Group (UR GRePS), Lyon 2 University, Lyon, France.
Lidia DelrieuResidual Tumor & Response To Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, Translational Research Department, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Agnes DumasUniversité de Paris, ECEVE UMR 1123, INSERM (National Institute for Health and Medical Research), Paris, France.
Fabien ReyalDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the dynamics of the determinants of returning to work (RTW) in a population of patients treated for breast cancer (BC) in a real-world setting.

methodWe conducted a retrospective study including 1278 BC patients working or looking for work at the time of diagnosis. We performed a focused principal component analysis to highlight the dimensions of a persistent decline in work capacity. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify correlates of non-RTW 1 and 2 years after treatment.

resultsOne-third (31%, n = 389) of patients continued working during treatment. At study inclusion, 1100 patients had returned to work (89%). Three-quarters (n = 508, 75%) of the women reported a decline in work capacity 1 year after RTW and 22% (n = 148) presented a persistent decline in work capacity 2 years after the diagnosis. The odds ratio for non-RTW at 1 year was significantly higher for patients treated with a combination of chemotherapy and trastuzumab (OR = 1.72, 95% CI [1.07-2.76]), manual workers (OR = 3.99, 95% CI [1.54-10.81]), patients with lower incomes (OR = 2.33, 95% CI [1.29-4.19]), and patients experiencing fatigue (OR = 1.81, 95% CI [1.34-2.48]). The odds ratio for non-RTW at 2 years was higher for various occupational categories (OR = 3.49, 95% CI [1.89-6.74] for clerks, OR = 4.58, 95% CI [1.48-12.82] for self-employed workers, OR = 8.98, 95% CI [2.69-27.89] for manual workers), patients with comorbidities (OR = 2.80, 95% CI [1.61-4.93]), and patients experiencing anxiety symptoms (OR = 2.54, 95% CI [1.18-5.76]), while the impact of the type of treatment was no longer significantly associated with RTW.

conclusionThe determinants of RTW change over time. Patients should be offered supportive interventions tailored to risk factors and time from diagnosis.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsReturn to WorkAnxietyEmploymentFemaleHumansRetrospective StudiesBreast cancerDeterminantsProfessional activityReturn to work

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.