Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35396821›Full record

ArticleAutism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research2022

A mixed methods evaluation of the acceptability of therapy using LEGO® bricks (LEGO® based therapy) in mainstream primary and secondary education.

Amy Barr, Elizabeth Coates, Ellen Kingsley, Gina Gomez de la Cuesta, Katie Biggs, Ann Le Couteur, Barry Wright

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amy BarrClinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7990-7451
Elizabeth CoatesClinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Ellen KingsleyCOMIC, Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Leeds, UK.
Gina Gomez de la CuestaPlay Included Community Interest Company, Cambridge, UK.
Katie BiggsClinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Ann Le CouteurPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Barry WrightHealth Sciences, University of York, York, UK.

Funding

Department of Health PHR15/49/32
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many autistic children and young people need extra support with social skills. Social skills programmes, such as LEGO® based therapy (LBT), are commonly used to help with these difficulties. The aim of this study was to examine the acceptability of LBT using qualitative interviews and questionnaires with facilitators and parents/guardians on behalf of autistic children and young people. Acceptability was measured in line with constructs of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Questionnaires were analyzed descriptively and between group comparisons were undertaken using the Mann-Whitney U Test. Telephone interviews were undertaken with a sub-sample of facilitators. All interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and framework analysis was performed by two researchers supported by NVivo. The questionnaire response rate was 80% for facilitators and 77% for parents/guardians. Overall acceptability, measured on a 1-5 (minimum-maximum) scale, was high for both facilitators and parents/guardians with a median (range) of 5 (4-5) and 4 (3-5), respectively. Facilitators rated the acceptability of the programme significantly higher overall than parents (p < 0.001). Facilitators reported that participants and wider school staff viewed the programme positively. They observed improvements in communication and social skills during the sessions. Potential barriers to programme delivery, such as resources and staff schedules, were identified but facilitators reported that these challenges did not outweigh the benefits. There is increasing emphasis on the role of schools in seeking to improve social outcomes for autistic children therefore this high degree of acceptability makes this an attractive school-based programme for schools, autistic children and their families. LAY SUMMARY: Social skills programmes, such as LEGO® based therapy (LBT), are often used to help autistic children and young people with their social skills. The acceptability of LBT with school staff and parents/guardians on behalf of children and young people was explored using interviews and questionnaires. Our results show that LBT is viewed as a highly acceptable programme that can help autistic children and young people improve their communication and social skills.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderAdolescentChildHumansParentsSchoolsSocial SkillsSurveys and QuestionnairesautismLEGO®play brick therapyqualitative researchquestionnairessocial communication

Identifiers

PMID35396821
PMCPMC9324108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.