Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35396659›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2022

WHO Ordinal Scale and Inflammation Risk Categories in COVID-19. Comparative Study of the Severity Scales.

Manuel Rubio-Rivas, José María Mora-Luján, Francesc Formiga, Coral Arévalo-Cañas, Juan Manuel Lebrón Ramos, María Victoria Villalba García, Eva Mª Fonseca Aizpuru, Jesús Díez-Manglano, Francisco Arnalich Fernández, Juan Luis Romero Cabrera and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. LongitudinalJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Manuel Rubio-RivasDepartment of Internal Medicine, Bellvitge University Hospital, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute-IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. mrubio@bellvitgehospital.cat.ORCID 0000-0002-9548-1374
José María Mora-LujánDepartment of Internal Medicine, Bellvitge University Hospital, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute-IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Francesc FormigaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Bellvitge University Hospital, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute-IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Coral Arévalo-CañasDepartment of Internal Medicine, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Juan Manuel Lebrón RamosDepartment of Internal Medicine, Costa del Sol Hospital, Marbella, Málaga, Spain.
María Victoria Villalba GarcíaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gregorio Marañón University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Eva Mª Fonseca AizpuruDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cabueñes University Hospital, Gijón, Spain.
Jesús Díez-ManglanoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Royo Villanova Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain.
Francisco Arnalich FernándezDepartment of Internal Medicine, La Paz/Carlos III/Cantoblanco University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Juan Luis Romero CabreraLipids and Atherosclerosis Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Córdoba (IMIBIC), Reina Sofía University Hospital, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
Gema María García GarcíaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Badajoz University Hospital, Badajoz, Spain.
Paula M Pesqueira FontanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Santiago de Compostela Clinical Hospital, Santiago de Compostela, La Coruña, Spain.
Juan Antonio Vargas NúñezDepartment of Internal Medicine, Puerta de Hierro University Hospital, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
Santiago Jesús Freire CastroDepartment of Internal Medicine, A Coruña University Hospital, La Coruña, Spain.
José Loureiro AmigoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Moisès Broggi Hospital, Sant Joan Despí, Barcelona, Spain.
Maria de Los Reyes Pascual PérezDepartment of Internal Medicine, Elda University General Hospital, Elda, Alicante, Spain.
José N Alcalá PedrajasDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pozoblanco Hospital, Pozoblanco, Córdoba, Spain.
Daniel Encinas-SánchezDepartment of Internal Medicine, Salamanca University Hospital-IBSAL, Salamanca, Spain.
Carmen Mella PérezDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ferrol Clinical University Hospital, Ferrol, La Coruña, Spain.
Javier EnaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Marina Baixa Hospital, Villajoyosa, Alicante, Spain.
Anyuli Gracia GutiérrezDepartment of Internal Medicine, Defense General Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain.
María José Esteban GinerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Virgen de los Lirios Hospital, Alcoy, Alicante, Spain.
José F VaronaDepartment of Internal Medicine, HM Montepríncipe University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Jesús Millán Núñez-CortésDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gregorio Marañón University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
José-Manuel Casas-RojoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Infanta Cristina University Hospital, Parla, Madrid, Spain.
SEMI-COVID-19 Network

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe WHO ordinal severity scale has been used to predict mortality and guide trials in COVID-19. However, it has its limitations.

objectiveThe present study aims to compare three classificatory and predictive models: the WHO ordinal severity scale, the model based on inflammation grades, and the hybrid model.

designRetrospective cohort study with patient data collected and followed up from March 1, 2020, to May 1, 2021, from the nationwide SEMI-COVID-19 Registry. The primary study outcome was in-hospital mortality. As this was a hospital-based study, the patients included corresponded to categories 3 to 7 of the WHO ordinal scale. Categories 6 and 7 were grouped in the same category. KEY

resultsA total of 17,225 patients were included in the study. Patients classified as high risk in each of the WHO categories according to the degree of inflammation were as follows: 63.8% vs. 79.9% vs. 90.2% vs. 95.1% (p<0.001). In-hospital mortality for WHO ordinal scale categories 3 to 6/7 was as follows: 0.8% vs. 24.3% vs. 45.3% vs. 34% (p<0.001). In-hospital mortality for the combined categories of ordinal scale 3a to 5b was as follows: 0.4% vs. 1.1% vs. 11.2% vs. 27.5% vs. 35.5% vs. 41.1% (p<0.001). The predictive regression model for in-hospital mortality with our proposed combined ordinal scale reached an AUC=0.871, superior to the two models separately.

conclusionsThe present study proposes a new severity grading scale for COVID-19 hospitalized patients. In our opinion, it is the most informative, representative, and predictive scale in COVID-19 patients to date.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansInflammationRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeWorld Health OrganizationCOVID-19inflammationprognosisWHO ordinal scale

Identifiers

PMID35396659
PMCPMC8992782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.