Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35396574›Full record

SynthesisEye (London, England)2023

Efficacy, safety, and treatment burden of treat-and-extend versus alternative anti-VEGF regimens for nAMD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Daniel Rosenberg, Deven M Deonarain, Jonah Gould, Amirthan Sothivannan, Mark R Phillips, Gurkaran S Sarohia, Sobha Sivaprasad, Charles C Wykoff, Chui Ming Gemmy Cheung, David Sarraf and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Eye (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
13.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. One-year real-world data of intravitreal faricimab in patients with pre-treated neovascular age-related macular degeneration.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sub-retinal pigment epithelium features as predictors for limited interval extension of faricimab in treatment-naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Treatment outcomes of switching to aflibercept 8 mg in previously-treated neovascular age-related macular degeneration.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Daniel RosenbergMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8P 1H6, Canada.
Deven M DeonarainSt. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton and McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8G 5E4, Canada.
Jonah GouldMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8P 1H6, Canada.
Amirthan SothivannanMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8P 1H6, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1994-4039
Mark R PhillipsDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8P 1H6, Canada.
Gurkaran S SarohiaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Alberta, 400, 10924, 107 Avenue, Edmonton, AB, T5H 0X5, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2102-9518
Sobha SivaprasadNIHR Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, EC1V 2PD, UK.
Charles C WykoffRetina Consultants of Houston, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Chui Ming Gemmy CheungSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3358-3516
David SarrafStein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Greater Los Angeles Veterans Administration Healthcare Center, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Sophie J BakriDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Varun ChaudharySt. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton and McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8G 5E4, Canada. vchaudh@mcmaster.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9988-4146
McMaster University · CASt. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton · CAImpact · CAMayo Clinic · USNIHR Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre · GBRetina Consultants of Texas · USSingapore National Eye Center · SGUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to compare efficacy and treatment burden of treat-and-extend (T&E) anti-VEGF against fixed and pro re nata (PRN) regimens for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and EMBASE were searched. Randomized-controlled trials and observational studies comparing T&E to PRN or fixed dosing for treatment-naïve AMD patients were included. Mean difference (MD) for visual acuity (VA) and number of injections are presented. Risk of bias was assessed according to Cochrane guidelines. Methodology was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). VA improvement was similar with T&E and fixed dosing at one (MD -0.08 letters, p = 0.95) and two years (MD 0.58 letters, p = 0.62). In contrast, VA improvements were significantly greater for T&E when compared against a PRN regimen at one (MD 3.95 letters, p < 0.0001) and two years (MD 4.08 letters, p < 0.001). Significantly fewer ranibizumab injections were administered in the T&E arm at one (MD -2.42 injections, p < 0.0001) and two years (MD -6.06 injections, p < 0.00001) relative to fixed dosing. Fewer aflibercept injections were likewise administered to patients on a T&E regimen versus fixed dosing at one year (MD -0.78 injections, p < 0.0001). Low-certainty evidence from the present synthesis implies that T&E preserves VA similar to fixed schedules with significantly fewer injections at one and two years. Also, patients with T&E dosing achieved better VA outcomes than those on PRN regimen but T&E dosing was associated with more injections.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsWet Macular DegenerationClinical ProtocolsHumansIntravitreal InjectionsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRanibizumabReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsTreatment OutcomeVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAngiogenesis InhibitorsRanibizumabReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID35396574
PMCPMC9829919
OpenAlexW4223532933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.