Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35396546›Full record

ReviewNature protocols2022

Purification of mammalian telomeric DNA for single-molecule analysis.

Giulia Mazzucco, Armela Huda, Martina Galli, Elia Zanella, Ylli Doksani

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Giulia MazzuccoIFOM, FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Armela HudaIFOM, FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Martina GalliIFOM, FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Elia ZanellaIFOM, FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Ylli DoksaniIFOM, FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy. ylli.doksani@ifom.eu.ORCID 0000-0002-2392-5722
IFOM · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here we provide a detailed protocol for the enrichment of telomeric repeats from mouse and human cells. The procedure consists of two successive rounds of digestion with frequently cutting restriction enzymes followed by size fractionation. Around 2 mg of genomic DNA is required, and the procedure lasts 5-6 d and yields preparations enriched >800-fold in telomeres. The purified material is suitable for single-molecule analysis of telomere structure, visualizing telomere replication and recombination intermediates by electron microscopy or performing molecular combing at telomeric repeats. No special skills are required for the enrichment procedure, while some assistance is needed in harvesting a large number of plates in a timely fashion at the beginning of the procedure. A smaller-scale version of the protocol that involves one round of digestion and purification requires 200 µg of DNA and enriches telomeres ~50-fold in 4 d is also provided. The latter can be combined with specific labeling for single-molecule analysis of replicating DNA or for long-read sequencing analysis of telomeric repeats. The procedure described here can be adapted to the enrichment of other repetitive elements, based on the use of restriction enzymes that do not cut into the repeat of interest.

Indexed as

DNATelomereAnimalsDNA-Binding ProteinsMammalsMiceRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidDNADNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID35396546
OpenAlexW4223595666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.