Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35396535›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2022

Rearrangement processes and structural variations show evidence of selection in oesophageal adenocarcinomas.

Alvin Wei Tian Ng, Gianmarco Contino, Sarah Killcoyne, Ginny Devonshire, Ray Hsu, Sujath Abbas, Jing Su, Aisling M Redmond, Jamie M J Weaver, Matthew D Eldridge and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Alvin Wei Tian Ng *Medical Research Council Cancer Unit, Hutchison/Medical Research Council Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4672-0815
Gianmarco Contino *Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medical & Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Sarah KillcoyneMedical Research Council Cancer Unit, Hutchison/Medical Research Council Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Ginny DevonshireCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1408-8176
Ray HsuDepartment of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Sujath AbbasMedical Research Council Cancer Unit, Hutchison/Medical Research Council Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Jing SuCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Aisling M RedmondMedical Research Council Cancer Unit, Hutchison/Medical Research Council Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Jamie M J WeaverCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Matthew D EldridgeCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5799-8911
Simon TavaréCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Oesophageal Cancer Clinical and Molecular Stratification (OCCAMS) Consortium
Paul A W EdwardsMedical Research Council Cancer Unit, Hutchison/Medical Research Council Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4789-3374
Rebecca C FitzgeraldMedical Research Council Cancer Unit, Hutchison/Medical Research Council Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. rcf29@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3434-3568

Funding

Cancer Research UK 15874Cancer Research UK 20406Cancer Research UK 23924Cancer Research UK 25487Department of Health BRC-1215-20014Medical Research Council MR/W014122/1Medical Research Council RG84369
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) provides an ideal case study to characterize large-scale rearrangements. Using whole genome short-read sequencing of 383 cases, for which 214 had matched whole transcriptomes, we observed structural variations (SV) with a predominance of deletions, tandem duplications and inter-chromosome junctions that could be identified as LINE-1 mobile element (ME) insertions. Complex clusters of rearrangements resembling breakage-fusion-bridge cycles or extrachromosomal circular DNA accounted for 22% of complex SVs affecting known oncogenes. Counting SV events affecting known driver genes substantially increased the recurrence rates of these drivers. After excluding fragile sites, we identified 51 candidate new drivers in genomic regions disrupted by SVs, including ETV5, KAT6B and CLTC. RUNX1 was the most recurrently altered gene (24%), with many deletions inactivating the RUNT domain but preserved the reading frame, suggesting an altered protein product. These findings underscore the importance of identification of SV events in OAC with implications for targeted therapies.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaEsophageal NeoplasmsGenome, HumanHistone AcetyltransferasesHumansWhole Genome SequencingHistone AcetyltransferasesKAT6B protein, human

Identifiers

PMID35396535
PMCPMC8993906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.