Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35396530›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Rapid, automated nerve histomorphometry through open-source artificial intelligence.

Simeon Christian Daeschler, Marie-Hélène Bourget, Dorsa Derakhshan, Vasudev Sharma, Stoyan Ivaylov Asenov, Tessa Gordon, Julien Cohen-Adad, Gregory Howard Borschel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Increased Nerve Density Adversely Affects Outcome in Oral Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Simeon Christian Daeschler *SickKids Research Institute, Neuroscience and Mental Health Program, Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), Toronto, ON, Canada. simeondaeschler@gmail.com.
Marie-Hélène Bourget *NeuroPoly Laboratory, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Dorsa DerakhshanUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Vasudev SharmaNeuroPoly Laboratory, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Stoyan Ivaylov AsenovNeuroPoly Laboratory, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Tessa GordonSickKids Research Institute, Neuroscience and Mental Health Program, Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), Toronto, ON, Canada.
Julien Cohen-AdadNeuroPoly Laboratory, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Gregory Howard BorschelSickKids Research Institute, Neuroscience and Mental Health Program, Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

CIHR CIHR FDN-143263
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to develop and validate a deep learning model for automated segmentation and histomorphometry of myelinated peripheral nerve fibers from light microscopic images. A convolutional neural network integrated in the AxonDeepSeg framework was trained for automated axon/myelin segmentation using a dataset of light-microscopic cross-sectional images of osmium tetroxide-stained rat nerves including various axonal regeneration stages. In a second dataset, accuracy of automated segmentation was determined against manual axon/myelin labels. Automated morphometry results, including axon diameter, myelin sheath thickness and g-ratio were compared against manual straight-line measurements and morphometrics extracted from manual labels with AxonDeepSeg as a reference standard. The neural network achieved high pixel-wise accuracy for nerve fiber segmentations with a mean (± standard deviation) ground truth overlap of 0.93 (± 0.03) for axons and 0.99 (± 0.01) for myelin sheaths, respectively. Nerve fibers were identified with a sensitivity of 0.99 and a precision of 0.97. For each nerve fiber, the myelin thickness, axon diameter, g-ratio, solidity, eccentricity, orientation, and individual x -and y-coordinates were determined automatically. Compared to manual morphometry, automated histomorphometry showed superior agreement with the reference standard while reducing the analysis time to below 2.5% of the time needed for manual morphometry. This open-source convolutional neural network provides rapid and accurate morphometry of entire peripheral nerve cross-sections. Given its easy applicability, it could contribute to significant time savings in biomedical research while extracting unprecedented amounts of objective morphologic information from large image datasets.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMyelin SheathAnimalsAxonsMicroscopyNerve Fibers, MyelinatedRats

Identifiers

PMID35396530
PMCPMC8993871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.