Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35396521›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Evoked responses to rhythmic visual stimulation vary across sources of intrinsic alpha activity in humans.

R Nuttall, C Jäger, J Zimmermann, M E Archila-Melendez, C Preibisch, P Taylor, P Sauseng, A Wohlschläger, C Sorg, J Dowsett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Spectral tuning and after-effects in neural entrainment.Behavioral and brain functions : BBF · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

R NuttallSchool of Medicine, TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. rachel.nuttall@tum.de.
C JägerSchool of Medicine, TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
J ZimmermannSchool of Medicine, TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
M E Archila-MelendezSchool of Medicine, TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
C PreibischSchool of Medicine, TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
P TaylorDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.
P SausengMunich Center for Neurosciences - Brain and Mind, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.
A WohlschlägerSchool of Medicine, TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
C Sorg *School of Medicine, TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
J Dowsett *School of Medicine, TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rhythmic flickering visual stimulation produces steady-state visually evoked potentials (SSVEPs) in electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings. Based on electrode-level analyses, two dichotomous models of the underpinning mechanisms leading to SSVEP generation have been proposed: entrainment or superposition, i.e., phase-alignment or independence of endogenous brain oscillations from flicker-induced oscillations, respectively. Electrode-level analyses, however, represent an averaged view of underlying 'source-level' activity, at which variability in SSVEPs may lie, possibly suggesting the co-existence of multiple mechanisms. To probe this idea, we investigated the variability of SSVEPs derived from the sources underpinning scalp EEG responses during presentation of a flickering radial checkerboard. Flicker was presented between 6 and 12 Hz in 1 Hz steps, and at individual alpha frequency (IAF i.e., the dominant frequency of endogenous alpha oscillatory activity). We tested whether sources of endogenous alpha activity could be dissociated according to evoked responses to different flicker frequencies relative to IAF. Occipitoparietal sources were identified by temporal independent component analysis, maximal resting-state alpha power at IAF and source localisation. The pattern of SSVEPs to rhythmic flicker relative to IAF was estimated by correlation coefficients, describing the correlation between the peak-to-peak amplitude of the SSVEP and the absolute distance of the flicker frequency from IAF across flicker conditions. We observed extreme variability in correlation coefficients across sources, ranging from -0.84 to 0.93, with sources showing largely different coefficients co-existing within subjects. This result demonstrates variation in evoked responses to flicker across sources of endogenous alpha oscillatory activity. Data support the idea of multiple SSVEP mechanisms.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, VisualBrainElectrodesHumansPhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID35396521
PMCPMC8993822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.