ArticleScientific reports2022
Comprehensive analysis of genetic factors predicting overall survival in Myelodysplastic syndromes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effect of RAS Pathway Gene Mutations on Survival in Myelodysplastic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterPooled it
- Article
- Critical Role of Molecular-Based Stratification in Low-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome with Direct Progression to Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Case Report.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Prognostic implications of genetic and transcriptomic abnormalities in MDS according to IPSS-R, IPSS-M, and the International Consensus Classification.Blood cancer journal · 2026Article
- DDX10 RNA Helicase: Structure, Function, and Oncogenic Roles Across Solid and Hematologic Tumors.Genes · 2026Review
- Review
- Hotspot gene mutations and treatment response in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS): predictive biomarkers and targeted strategies.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Immunophenotyping myelodysplastic neoplasms: the role of flow cytometry in the molecular classification era.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Genetic, Phenotypic, and Clinical Heterogeneity of NPM1-Mutant Acute Myeloid Leukemias.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- The Genetic Landscape of Myelodysplastic Neoplasm Progression to Acute Myeloid Leukemia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Molecular Drivers of Myelodysplastic Neoplasms (MDS)-Classification and Prognostic Relevance.Cells · 2023Review
- Acute myeloid leukemia: novel mutations and their clinical implications.American journal of blood research · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a group of clonal hematological disease with high risk of progression to AML. Accurate risk stratification is of importance for the proper management of MDS. Genetic lesions (Cytogenetic and Molecular mutations) are known to help in prognosticating the MDS patients. We have studied 152 MDS patients using cytogenetics and next generation sequencing (NGS). These patients were evaluated and as per cytogenetic prognostic group, majority (92.1%) of the patients classified as good (81.6%) and intermediate (10.5%) group. The NGS identified 38 different gene mutations in our cohort. Among 111 MDS patients with mutations, the most frequent mutated genes were SF3B1 (25.2%), SRSF2 (19%) U2AF1 (14.4%) ASXL1 (9.9%) RUNX1 (9.9%) TET2 (9%), TP53 (9%), ATM (6.3%), NRAS (5.4%) and JAK2/3 (5.4%). The survival analysis revealed that the mutations in TP53, JAK2/3, KRAS, NRAS and ASXL1 were significantly (P < 0.05) associated with poor survival of the patients. The univariate cox and multivariate cox analysis of our study suggested that the age, marrow morphology, cytogenetic and gene mutations with IPSS-R should be considered for prognosticating the MDS patients. We have proposed M-IPSS-R which changed the risk stratification i.e. 66.3% patients had decreased risk whereas 33.75% showed increased risk compared to IPSS-R. The survival analysis also showed that the M-IPSS-R were more significant in separating the patients as per their risk than the IPSS-R alone. The change in risk stratification could help in proper strategy for the treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.