ArticleNature methods2022
Critical Assessment of Metagenome Interpretation: the second round of challenges.
Article in Nature methods, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 219 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
219 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Packaging and containerization of computational methods.Nature protocols · 2024Pooled it
- metaFun: An analysis pipeline for metagenomic big data with fast and unified functional searches.Gut microbes · 2026Article
- Perseus: lineage-aware refinement of Kraken2 taxonomic classification for long read metagenomes.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Problems With GO Enrichment as an Endpoint for Ecological Omics Interpretation.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Comparative metagenomic assessment of Illumina-compatible library preparation methods, short-read lengths, and PacBio HiFi sequencing reveals differences in microbial and functional diversity recovery from a complex environmental sample.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- metaWEPP: leveraging biobank-scale intra-species phylogenies for near-haplotype resolution in metagenomic analysis.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Hunting for Helminths: short- and long-read shotgun metagenomics for helminth detection in faecal samples.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Phage bioinformatics tools: a review of computational approaches for bacteriophage research.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Benchmarking methods for extracting microbial signal from host-dominated metatranscriptomes.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Deployable high-fidelity metagenome binning at scale with QuickBin.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Responsible Use of Large Language Models in Microbial Genomics and Bioinformatics: A Life-Science Framework for Reliability, Reproducibility, and Risk-Aware Interpretation.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Comprehensive taxonomic identification of microbial species in metagenomic data using SingleM and Sandpiper.Nature biotechnology · 2026Article
- Eco-evolutionary dynamics of massive, parallel bacteriophage outbreaks in compost communities.Science advances · 2026Article
- Benchmarking the impact of reference genome selection on taxonomic profiling accuracy.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Metabolic reprogramming of the infant gut by bifidobacteria-based probiotics drives exclusion of antibiotic-resistant pathobionts.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Article
- Plant-associated fungi co-opt ancient antimicrobials for host manipulation.Science advances · 2026Article
- Benchmarking shotgun metagenomics.Nature microbiology · 2026Article
- Rapid phylogenomic analysis for viral surveillance and metagenomic profiling with Omni2Tree.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- TIPP-SD: A new method for species detection in microbiomes.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Benchmarking of shotgun sequencing depth reveals the potential and limitations of shallow metagenomics and strain-level analysis.Nature microbiology · 2026Article
159 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
103 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evaluating metagenomic software is key for optimizing metagenome interpretation and focus of the Initiative for the Critical Assessment of Metagenome Interpretation (CAMI). The CAMI II challenge engaged the community to assess methods on realistic and complex datasets with long- and short-read sequences, created computationally from around 1,700 new and known genomes, as well as 600 new plasmids and viruses. Here we analyze 5,002 results by 76 program versions. Substantial improvements were seen in assembly, some due to long-read data. Related strains still were challenging for assembly and genome recovery through binning, as was assembly quality for the latter. Profilers markedly matured, with taxon profilers and binners excelling at higher bacterial ranks, but underperforming for viruses and Archaea. Clinical pathogen detection results revealed a need to improve reproducibility. Runtime and memory usage analyses identified efficient programs, including top performers with other metrics. The results identify challenges and guide researchers in selecting methods for analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.