ArticleSpinal cord2022
Perspectives on medical assistance in dying amongst persons with traumatic spinal cord injury: a qualitative study.
Article in Spinal cord, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designQualitative.
objectiveTo explore the perspectives of persons living with chronic (>5 y) traumatic spinal cord injuries (tSCI) concerning medical assistance in dying (MAID).
settingSaskatchewan, Canada.
methodsQualitative exploratory using an interpretative description methodology. Individual semi-structured interviews were held with online video conferencing. Interviews were analyzed using codebook thematic analysis.
resultsTen persons with a chronic (>5 y) tSCI participated (seven males, three females; age 20s-50s; spinal cord level C2-T10). Participants expressed support for persons living with SCI having access to MAID, specifically in the context of preserving autonomy and respecting equality when compared with able-bodied individuals. However, some were concerned about the implications of access to MAID solely based on the diagnosis of a SCI. Participants also emphasized the variability in the initial personal response to injury and expressed concern about MAID being immediately available after injury. They explained the significance and necessity of reflecting on the injury in what can be a lengthy process of adjustment and acceptance. Participants also discussed the importance of hope and highlighted the irreplaceable value of peer support in shaping hope throughout rehabilitation and the need for compassionate, comprehensive, and continuous care to facilitate reintegration and support independence.
conclusionsAccess to MAID provides a greater range of choices for individuals with tSCI but could increase deaths occurring before optimal adaptation and adjustment. The involvement of inter-professional teams, mental health specialists and peers is important to frame hope and understand the potential of a fulfilling life with a tSCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.