Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35396389›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Antimicrobial effects of microwave plasma-activated water with skin protective effect for novel disinfectants in pandemic era.

Hye Ran Lee, Yun Sang Lee, Young Suk You, Jin Young Huh, Kangil Kim, Yong Cheol Hong, Chul-Ho Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Plasma-Activated Water Against Carbapenem-ResistantPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Cold Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Solutions for Sustainable Food Packaging.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hye Ran LeeDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Catholic Kwandong University International St. Mary's Hospital, Incheon, 22711, Republic of Korea.
Yun Sang LeeDepartment of Otolaryngology, School of Medicine, Ajou University, 164 World-Cup Street, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, 16499, Republic of Korea.
Young Suk YouPlarit Co., Ltd., 443 Samnye-ro Samnye-eup, Wanju-gun, Jeollabuk-do, 565-701, Republic of Korea.
Jin Young HuhICD Co., Ltd., 274 Manse-ro, Daedeok-myeon, Anseong-si, Gyeonggi-do, 17542, Republic of Korea.
Kangil KimInstitute of Plasma Technology, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, 814-2 Ohsikdo-dong, Gunsan, 573-540, Republic of Korea.
Yong Cheol HongDivision of Applied Technology Research, National Fusion Research Institute, 113 Gwahangno, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 305-333, Republic of Korea.
Chul-Ho KimDepartment of Otolaryngology, School of Medicine, Ajou University, 164 World-Cup Street, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, 16499, Republic of Korea. ostium@ajou.ac.kr.
Ajou University · KRKorea Institute of Fusion Energy · KRCatholic Kwandong University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin antiseptics have important implications for public health and medicine. Although conventional antiseptics have considerable antimicrobial activity, skin toxicity and the development of resistance are common problems. Plasma-treated water has sterilization and tissue-regenerative effects. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify whether plasma-activated water (PAW) manufactured by our microwave plasma system can be used as a novel antiseptic solution for skin protection. PAW was produced by dissolving reactive nitrogen oxide gas using microwave plasma in deionized water. The antibacterial effects of PAW against Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus cereus, and Salmonella typhimurium and effective concentrations were investigated by a solid agar plate assay. The factors mediating the effects of PAW were evaluated by the addition of reactive species scavengers. Cytotoxicity and cell viability assays were performed to examine the protective effect of PAW on normal skin cells. PAW exhibited excellent sterilization and no toxicity in normal skin cells. Experiments also confirmed the potential of PAW as a sanitizer for SARS-CoV-2. Our findings support the use of PAW as an effective skin disinfectant with good safety in the current situation of a global pandemic.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective Agents, LocalCOVID-19DisinfectantsEscherichia coliHumansMicrowavesPandemicsSARS-CoV-2WaterAnti-Infective Agents, LocalDisinfectantsWater

Identifiers

PMID35396389
PMCPMC8992786
OpenAlexW4223578702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.