Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35396294›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Study protocol for the development and internal validation of Schizophrenia Prediction of Resistance to Treatment (SPIRIT): a clinical tool for predicting risk of treatment resistance to antipsychotics in first-episode schizophrenia.

Saeed Farooq, Miriam Hattle, Paola Dazzan, Tom Kingstone, Olesya Ajnakina, David Shiers, Maria Antonietta Nettis, Andrew Lawrence, Richard Riley, Danielle van der Windt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Distinct structural deficits in treatment-resistant schizophrenia and their putative neurotransmitter basis: a source-based morphometry analysis.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Saeed FarooqMidlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Stafford, Staffordshire, UK s.farooq@keele.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2088-6876
Miriam HattleSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
Paola DazzanDepartment of Biostatistics & Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Tom KingstoneMidlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Stafford, Staffordshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9179-2303
Olesya AjnakinaDepartment of Biostatistics & Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
David ShiersSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
Maria Antonietta NettisDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5401-8391
Andrew LawrenceDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, University of London, London, UK.
Richard RileySchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8699-0735
Danielle van der WindtSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7248-6703
Indiana University School of MedicineKing's College London · GBMidlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of London · GBGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MC_PC_11003Medical Research Council MR/S003444/1MRF_ C0439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTreatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) is associated with significant impairment of functioning and high treatment costs. Identification of patients at high risk of TRS at the time of their initial diagnosis may significantly improve clinical outcomes and minimise social and functional disability. We aim to develop a prognostic model for predicting the risk of developing TRS in patients with first-episode schizophrenia and to examine its potential utility and acceptability as a clinical decision tool. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will use two well-characterised longitudinal UK-based first-episode psychosis cohorts: Aetiology and Ethnicity in Schizophrenia and Other Psychoses and Genetics and Psychosis for which data have been collected on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. We will identify candidate predictors for the model based on current literature and stakeholder consultation. Model development will use all data, with the number of candidate predictors restricted according to available sample size and event rate. A model for predicting risk of TRS will be developed based on penalised regression, with missing data handled using multiple imputation. Internal validation will be undertaken via bootstrapping, obtaining optimism-adjusted estimates of the model's performance. The clinical utility of the model in terms of clinically relevant risk thresholds will be evaluated using net benefit and decision curves (comparative to competing strategies). Consultation with patients and clinical stakeholders will determine potential thresholds of risk for treatment decision-making. The acceptability of embedding the model as a clinical tool will be explored using qualitative focus groups with up to 20 clinicians in total from early intervention services. Clinicians will be recruited from services in Stafford and London with the focus groups being held via an online platform. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The development of the prognostic model will be based on anonymised data from existing cohorts, for which ethical approval is in place. Ethical approval has been obtained from Keele University for the qualitative focus groups within early intervention in psychosis services (ref: MH-210174). Suitable processes are in place to obtain informed consent for National Health Service staff taking part in interviews or focus groups. A study information sheet with cover letter and consent form have been prepared and approved by the local Research Ethics Committee. Findings will be shared through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and social media. A lay summary will be published on collaborator websites.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsPsychotic DisordersSchizophreniaHealth Care CostsHumansState MedicineAntipsychotic Agentspsychiatryqualitative researchSchizophrenia & psychotic disorders

Identifiers

PMID35396294
PMCPMC8996048
OpenAlexW4223546748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.