Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35396287›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Long-term cardiovascular risk prediction in the emergency department: a mixed-methods study protocol.

Charles Reynard, Brian McMillan, Anisa Jafar, Anthony Heagerty, Glen Philip Martin, Evangelos Kontopantelis, Richard Body

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Developing the EQUIPED approach to quality management using multi-grounded theory.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Charles ReynardDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK charlie.reynard@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7534-2668
Brian McMillanCentre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0683-3877
Anisa JafarHumanitarian and Conflict Response Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Anthony HeagertyDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Glen Philip MartinDivision of Informatics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3410-9472
Evangelos KontopantelisDivision of Informatics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Richard BodyDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCardiovascular disease (CVD) remains one of the leading causes of preventable death in Europe, therefore any opportunity to intervene and improve care should be maximised. Known CVD risk factors are routinely collected in the emergency department (ED), yet they are often not acted on. If the risk factors have prognostic value and a pathway can be created, then this would provide more holistic care for patients and reduce health system inefficiency. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this mixed-methods study, we will use quantitative methods to investigate the prognostic characteristics of routinely collected data for long-term CVD outcomes, and qualitative methods to investigate how to use and implement this knowledge. The quantitative arm will use a database of approximately 21 000 chest pain patient episodes with a mean follow-up of 7.3 years. We will use Cox regression to evaluate the prognostic characteristics of routinely collected ED data for long-term CVD outcomes. We will also use a series of semi-structured interviews to co-design a prototype care pathway with stakeholders via thematic analysis. To enable the development of prototypes, themes will be structured into a logic model consisting of situation, inputs, outputs and mechanism. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This work has been approved by Research Ethics Committee (Wales REC7) and the Human Research Authority under reference 19/WA/0312 and 19/WA/0311. It has also been approved by the Confidentiality Advisory Group reference 19/CAG/0209. Dissent recorded in the NHS' opt-out scheme will be applied to the dataset by NHS Digital. This work will be disseminated through peer-review publication, conference presentation and a public dissemination strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN41008456. PROTOCOL VERSION: V.1.0-7 June 2021.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCritical PathwaysEmergency Service, HospitalHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansRisk Factorsaccident & emergency medicinepreventive medicinepublic healthqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID35396287
PMCPMC8996042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.