ArticleGynecologic oncology2022
Definitive pelvic radiation therapy improves survival in stage IVB neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma: A NeCTuR study.
Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Treatment for Chronic Hemorrhagic Radiation Enteropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Advances in therapy · 2026Pooled it
- Recent progress and therapeutic strategies in the treatment of cervical neuroendocrine neoplasms (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Impact of high-dose pelvic radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy on local control, symptom relief, and safety in patients with stage IVB cervical cancer (FIGO 2018): a two-center retrospective study.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Is Moderately Hypofractionated Radiotherapy a Safe and Effective Strategy for Cervical Cancer?-A Review of Current Evidence.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (NECC): A retrospective study of 175 Chinese patients.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2025Article
- Risk factors for depression in patients in perimenopause with cervical cancer.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
- Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: a case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Population-Based Survival Analysis of Stage IVB Small-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma in Comparison to Major Histological Subtypes of Cervical Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Article
- Twenty-five-year mortality trends of four major histological subtypes of cervical cancer: a population-based study using the Osaka cancer registry data.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Advanced stage (FIGO IVB) neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the survival impact of adding definitive pelvic radiation therapy (RT) to chemotherapy among patients with stage IVB neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma (NECC).
methodsWe retrospectively studied patients with FIGO 2018 stage IVB NECC diagnosed during 1998-2020 who received chemotherapy with or without definitive whole pelvic RT (concurrent or sequential). Demographic, oncologic, and treatment characteristics were summarized. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method, and hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using Cox regression.
resultsThe study included 71 patients. Median age was 43 years (range, 24-75). Fifty-nine patients (83%) had pure neuroendocrine histology, and 57 (80%) had pretreatment tumor size >4 cm. Fifty-six patients (79%) received chemotherapy alone with (n = 15) or without (n = 41) palliative pelvic RT, and 15 (21%) received chemotherapy and definitive pelvic RT (chemo+RT). Median follow-up time was 20.1 months (range, 11.3-170.3) for the chemo+RT group and 13.5 months (range, 0.9-73.6) for the chemotherapy-alone group. Median PFS was 10.3 months (95% CI, 7.5-∞) for the chemo+RT group vs 6.6 months (95% CI, 6.1-8.7) for the chemotherapy-alone group (p = 0.0097). At 24 months, the PFS rate was 24% for chemo+RT vs 7.8% for chemotherapy alone. Median OS was 20.3 months (95% CI, 18.5-∞) for the chemo+RT group vs 13.6 months (95% CI, 11.3-19.2) for the chemotherapy-alone group (p = 0.0013). At 24 months, the OS rate was 49.2% for chemo+RT vs 21.5% for chemotherapy alone. In a Cox regression model, definitive RT was associated with improved PFS (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.23-0.83; p = 0.0119) and OS (HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.14-0.65; p = 0.0022).
conclusionsAddition of definitive pelvic RT to chemotherapy may improve survival in patients with stage IVB NECC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.