Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35395930›Full record

ArticleTrials2022

The development of theory-informed participant-centred interventions to maximise participant retention in randomised controlled trials.

Rumana Newlands, Eilidh Duncan, Shaun Treweek, Jim Elliott, Justin Presseau, Peter Bower, Graeme MacLennan, Margaret Ogden, Mary Wells, Miles D Witham and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rumana NewlandsHealth Services Research Unit, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK.
Eilidh DuncanHealth Services Research Unit, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK.
Shaun TreweekHealth Services Research Unit, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK.
Jim ElliottPublic Partner, Aberdeen, UK.
Justin PresseauClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Peter BowerNIHR School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Graeme MacLennanHealth Services Research Unit, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK.
Margaret OgdenPublic Partner, Aberdeen, UK.
Mary WellsFaculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK.
Miles D WithamAGE Research Group, NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre, Newcastle University and Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK.
Bridget YoungDepartment of Public Health, Policy and Systems, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Katie GilliesHealth Services Research Unit, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK. k.gillies@abdn.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7890-2854

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HSRU1Chief Scientist Office, Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorate HIPS/16/46Health Research Board Trial Methodology Research NetworkMedical Research Council MR/L01193X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA failure of clinical trials to retain participants can influence the trial findings and significantly impact the potential of the trial to influence clinical practice. Retention of participants involves people, often the trial participants themselves, performing a behaviour (e.g. returning a questionnaire or attending a follow-up clinic as part of the research). Most existing interventions that aim to improve the retention of trial participants fail to describe any theoretical basis for the potential effect (on behaviour) and also whether there was any patient and/or participant input during development. The aim of this study was to address these two problems by developing theory- informed, participant-centred, interventions to improve trial retention.

methodsThis study was informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework and Behaviour Change Techniques Taxonomy to match participant reported determinants of trial retention to theoretically informed behaviour change strategies. The prototype interventions were described and developed in a co-design workshop with trial participants. Acceptability and feasibility (guided by (by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability) of two prioritised retention interventions was explored during a focus group involving a range of trial stakeholders (e.g. trial participants, trial managers, research nurses, trialists, research ethics committee members). Following focus group discussions stakeholders completed an intervention acceptability questionnaire.

resultsEight trial participants contributed to the co-design of the retention interventions. Four behaviour change interventions were designed: (1) incentives and rewards for follow-up clinic attendance, (2) goal setting for improving questionnaire return, (3) participant self-monitoring to improve questionnaire return and/or clinic attendance, and (4) motivational information to improve questionnaire return and clinic attendance. Eighteen trial stakeholders discussed the two prioritised interventions. The motivational information intervention was deemed acceptable and considered straightforward to implement whilst the goal setting intervention was viewed as less clear and less acceptable.

conclusionsThis is the first study to develop interventions to improve trial retention that are based on the accounts of trial participants and also conceptualised and developed as behaviour change interventions (to encourage attendance at trial research visit or return a trial questionnaire). Further testing of these interventions is required to assess effectiveness.

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyMotivationHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch PersonnelRetention in CareSurveys and QuestionnairesBehaviourClinical trialsIntervention developmentRetentionTheory

Identifiers

PMID35395930
PMCPMC8994320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.