Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35395889›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of chemical physics2022

Estimation of binding rates and affinities from multiensemble Markov models and ligand decoupling.

Yunhui Ge, Vincent A Voelz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of chemical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yunhui GeDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, Irvine, California 92697, USA.ORCID s0000000239461440
Vincent A VoelzDepartment of Chemistry, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122, USA.ORCID s0000000210542124

Funding

Markov State Model approaches for folding, binding and designR01GM123296 · NIGMS · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI VOELZ, VINCENT · 2017 to 2025
$3.1M
Computer Cluster for Computational Biology and BiophysicsS10OD020095 · OD · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI LEVY, RONALD · 2015 to 2015
$442k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM123296NIH HHS S10 OD020095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate and efficient simulation of the thermodynamics and kinetics of protein-ligand interactions is crucial for computational drug discovery. Multiensemble Markov Model (MEMM) estimators can provide estimates of both binding rates and affinities from collections of short trajectories but have not been systematically explored for situations when a ligand is decoupled through scaling of non-bonded interactions. In this work, we compare the performance of two MEMM approaches for estimating ligand binding affinities and rates: (1) the transition-based reweighting analysis method (TRAM) and (2) a Maximum Caliber (MaxCal) based method. As a test system, we construct a small host-guest system where the ligand is a single uncharged Lennard-Jones (LJ) particle, and the receptor is an 11-particle icosahedral pocket made from the same atom type. To realistically mimic a protein-ligand binding system, the LJ ϵ parameter was tuned, and the system was placed in a periodic box with 860 TIP3P water molecules. A benchmark was performed using over 80 µs of unbiased simulation, and an 18-state Markov state model was used to estimate reference binding affinities and rates. We then tested the performance of TRAM and MaxCal when challenged with limited data. Both TRAM and MaxCal approaches perform better than conventional Markov state models, with TRAM showing better convergence and accuracy. We find that subsampling of trajectories to remove time correlation improves the accuracy of both TRAM and MaxCal and that in most cases, only a single biased ensemble to enhance sampled transitions is required to make accurate estimates.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationWaterKineticsLigandsProtein BindingThermodynamicsLigandsWater

Identifiers

PMID35395889
PMCPMC8993428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.