Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35395838›Full record

ReviewNPJ genomic medicine2022

Best practices for the interpretation and reporting of clinical whole genome sequencing.

Christina A Austin-Tse, Vaidehi Jobanputra, Denise L Perry, David Bick, Ryan J Taft, Eric Venner, Richard A Gibbs, Ted Young, Sarah Barnett, John W Belmont and 14 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ genomic medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Christina A Austin-Tse *Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. ctse@mgh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6492-6716
Vaidehi Jobanputra *Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, New York Genome Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0962-7873
Denise L PerryIllumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.
David BickHudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8750-306X
Ryan J TaftIllumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.
Eric VennerHuman Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Richard A GibbsHuman Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Ted YoungGenome Diagnostics, Department of Paediatric Laboratory Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4882-6752
Sarah BarnettDivision of Laboratory Genetics and Genomics, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
John W BelmontIllumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7409-3578
Nicole BoczekDivision of Laboratory Genetics and Genomics, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Shimul ChowdhuryRady Children's Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA.
Katarzyna A EllsworthRady Children's Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA.
Saurav GuhaMolecular Diagnostics Laboratory, New York Genome Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0620-5408
Shashikant KulkarniBaylor Genetics and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Cherisse MarcouDivision of Laboratory Genetics and Genomics, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Linyan MengBaylor Genetics and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
David R MurdockHuman Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Atteeq U RehmanMolecular Diagnostics Laboratory, New York Genome Center, New York, NY, USA.
Elizabeth SpiteriDepartment of Pathology, Stanford Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Amanda Thomas-WilsonMolecular Diagnostics Laboratory, New York Genome Center, New York, NY, USA.
Hutton M Kearney *Division of Laboratory Genetics and Genomics, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6002-6494
Heidi L Rehm *Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Medical Genome Initiative*

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole genome sequencing (WGS) shows promise as a first-tier diagnostic test for patients with rare genetic disorders. However, standards addressing the definition and deployment practice of a best-in-class test are lacking. To address these gaps, the Medical Genome Initiative, a consortium of leading health care and research organizations in the US and Canada, was formed to expand access to high quality clinical WGS by convening experts and publishing best practices. Here, we present best practice recommendations for the interpretation and reporting of clinical diagnostic WGS, including discussion of challenges and emerging approaches that will be critical to harness the full potential of this comprehensive test.

Identifiers

PMID35395838
PMCPMC8993917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.