Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35395696›Full record

ArticleLasers in surgery and medicine2022

Assessment of a 3050/3200 nm fiber laser system for ablative fractional laser treatments in dermatology.

Michael Wang-Evers, Alyre J Blazon-Brown, Linh Ha-Wissel, Valeriya Arkhipova, Dilip Paithankar, Ilya V Yaroslavsky, Gregory Altshuler, Dieter Manstein

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06295471 (A Comparative Clinical Study to Assess Pain Score and Wound Healing Following Fractional Ablation With a Difference Frequency Generation), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06295471 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Comparative Clinical Study to Assess Pain Score and Wound Healing Following Fractional Ablation With a Difference Frequency Generation (DFG) Laser and Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Laser

TypeinterventionalSponsorMassachusetts General HospitalRan2024 to 2027Enrolled23ConditionsHealthyArmsDFG Laser, CO2 Laser, Optical coherence tomography (OCT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Michael Wang-EversDepartment of Dermatology, Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6461-4891
Alyre J Blazon-BrownDepartment of Dermatology, Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Linh Ha-WisselDepartment of Dermatology, Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7641-9647
Valeriya ArkhipovaNTO IRE-Polus, Fryazino, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7304-6267
Dilip PaithankarIPG Medical, IPG Photonics Corporation, Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA.
Ilya V YaroslavskyIPG Medical, IPG Photonics Corporation, Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA.
Gregory AltshulerIPG Medical, IPG Photonics Corporation, Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA.
Dieter MansteinDepartment of Dermatology, Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Harvard University · USBG Medicine (United States) · USInstitute of Anthropology and Ethnography · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesMid-infrared (IR) ablative fractional laser treatments are highly efficacious for improving the appearance of a variety of dermatological conditions such as photo-aged skin. However, articulated arms are necessary to transmit the mid-IR light to the skin, which restricts practicality and clinical use. Here, we have assessed and characterized a novel fiber laser-pumped difference frequency generation (DFG) system that generates ablative fractional lesions and compared it to clinically and commercially available thulium fiber, Erbium:YAG (Er:YAG), and CO MATERIALS AND

methodsAn investigational 20 W, 3050/3200 nm fiber laser pumped DFG system with a focused spot size of 91 µm was used to generate microscopic ablation arrays in ex vivo human skin. Several pulse energies (10-70 mJ) and pulse durations (2-14 ms) were applied and lesion dimensions were assessed histologically using nitro-blue tetrazolium chloride stain. Ablation depths and coagulative thermal damage zones were analyzed across three additional laser systems.

resultsThe investigational DFG system-generated deep (>2 mm depth) and narrow (<100 µm diameter) ablative lesions surrounded by thermal coagulative zones of at least 20 µm thickness compared to 13, 40, and 320 µm by the Er:YAG, CO

conclusionThe DFG system is a small footprint device that offers a flexible fiber delivery system for ablative fractional laser treatments, thereby overcoming the requirement of an articulated arm in current commercially available ablative lasers. The depth and width of the ablated microcolumns and the extent of surrounding coagulation can be controlled; this concept can be used to design new treatment procedures for specific indications. Clinical improvements and safety are not the subject of this study and need to be explored with in vivo clinical studies.

Indexed as

DermatologyLasers, GasLasers, Solid-StateLaser TherapySkin AgingAgedCarbon DioxideHumansSkinThuliumCarbon DioxideThuliumdifference frequency generationfiber deliveryfractional ablationfractional laser

Identifiers

PMID35395696
PMCPMC9541207
OpenAlexW4223559073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.