Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35395609›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychiatric research2022

Attention profile of physically recovered COVID-19 inpatients on the day of discharge.

Aureo do Carmo Filho, Eelco van Duinkerken, Julio Cesar Tolentino, Sergio Luis Schmidt

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychiatric research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Attention Deficits in Healthcare Workers with Non-Clinical Burnout: An Exploratory Investigation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Aureo do Carmo FilhoPost-Graduate Program in Neurology, PPGNEURO, Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Eelco van DuinkerkenPost-Graduate Program in Neurology, PPGNEURO, Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil; Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Diabetes Center/Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Julio Cesar TolentinoPost-Graduate Program in Neurology, PPGNEURO, Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Sergio Luis SchmidtPost-Graduate Program in Neurology, PPGNEURO, Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. Electronic address: slschmidt@terra.com.br.
Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BRAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Few studies have reported specific attention deficits in post-COVID-19 patients. Attention consists of different subdomains. Disruptions to specific attention subdomains might impair a wide range of everyday tasks, including road safety. As there are millions of COVID-19 patients with different socio-economic backgrounds, screening of attentional performance less dependent on education is needed. Here, we verified if physically recovered COVID-19 inpatients showed specific attention decrements at discharge. The Continuous Visual Attention Test (CVAT) is a Go/No-go task which is independent of participants' schooling. It detects visuomotor reaction time (RT = intrinsic alertness), variability of reaction time (VRT = sustained attention), omission (focused-attention), and commission errors (response-inhibition). Thirty physically functional COVID-19 inpatients at discharge and 30 non-infected controls underwent the CVAT. A MANCOVA was performed to examine differences between controls and patients, followed by post-hoc ANCOVAs. Then, we identified the percentile score for each patient within the distribution of the CVAT performance of 211 subjects mentally capable of driving (reference group). COVID-19 patients at discharge showed greater RT and VRT, and more omission errors than controls. Twenty-two patients (73%) had performance below the 5th percentile of the reference group in one or more subdomains. As slow visuomotor RT, deficits in focusing and difficulties in keeping visual attention are associated with traffic accidents, we concluded that most COVID-19 patients at discharge had deficits that may increase the risk of road injuries. As these deficits will probably affect other daily activities, a routine assessment with the CVAT could provide useful information on whom to send to post-COVID centers.

Indexed as

Automobile DrivingCOVID-19HumansInpatientsPatient DischargeReaction TimeAttentional dysfunctionContinuous visual attention testCOVID-19Traffic safety

Identifiers

PMID35395609
PMCPMC8970603
OpenAlexW4220849529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.