Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35395594›Full record

ReviewDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2022

Utility of linear mixed effects models for event-related potential research with infants and children.

Megan J Heise, Serena K Mon, Lindsay C Bowman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Discourse Focus and Memory Encoding: The Role of Trial-Level Alpha Power.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Neural dynamics underlying the illusion of control during reward processing.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Megan J HeiseDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis, USA; Center for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, USA. Electronic address: mjheise@ucdavis.edu.
Serena K MonCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, USA.
Lindsay C BowmanDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis, USA; Center for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, USA.

Funding

Pediatric Head Models for Improved Imaging of Neurological DevelopmentR43NS067726 · NINDS · ELECTRICAL GEODESICS, INC. · PI TUROVETS, SERGEI · 2010 to 2011
$695k
NINDS NIH HHS R43 NS067726
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Event-related potentials (ERPs) are advantageous for investigating cognitive development. However, their application in infants/children is challenging given children's difficulty in sitting through the multiple trials required in an ERP task. Thus, a large problem in developmental ERP research is high subject exclusion due to too few analyzable trials. Common analytic approaches (that involve averaging trials within subjects and excluding subjects with too few trials, as in ANOVA and linear regression) work around this problem, but do not mitigate it. Moreover, these practices can lead to inaccuracies in measuring neural signals. The greater the subject exclusion, the more problematic inaccuracies can be. We review recent developmental ERP studies to illustrate the prevalence of these issues. Critically, we demonstrate an alternative approach to ERP analysis-linear mixed effects (LME) modeling-which offers unique utility in developmental ERP research. We demonstrate with simulated and real ERP data from preschool children that commonly employed ANOVAs yield biased results that become more biased as subject exclusion increases. In contrast, LME models yield accurate, unbiased results even when subjects have low trial-counts, and are better able to detect real condition differences. We include tutorials and example code to facilitate LME analyses in future ERP research.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsChild, PreschoolHumansLinear ModelsEmotion perceptionERPEvent-related potentialLinear mixed effectsMultilevel modelsNegative central

Identifiers

PMID35395594
PMCPMC8987653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.