Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35395192›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2022

Distinct inhibitory pathways control velocity and directional tuning in the mouse retina.

Mathew T Summers, Marla B Feller

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Natural motion statistics unify direction computations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Diverse and dynamic influences of saccades on visual representations in the mouse superior colliculus.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Differential Expression Analysis Identifies Candidate Synaptogenic Molecules for Wiring Direction-Selective Circuits in the Retina.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mathew T SummersDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Marla B FellerDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA; Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. Electronic address: mfeller@berkeley.edu.
University of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

UC Berkeley Vision Science COREP30EY003176 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI Xiaohua Gong · 1985 to 2026
$16.4M
The Function of Neural Activity in Developing RetinaR01EY013528 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Marla Feller · 2002 to 2026
$8.1M
Development of direction selectivity in the retinaR01EY019498 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI Marla Feller · 2009 to 2026
$6.6M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY003176NEI NIH HHS R01 EY013528NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019498
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sensory periphery is responsible for detecting ethologically relevant features of the external world, using compact, predominantly feedforward circuits. Visual motion is a particularly prevalent sensory feature, the presence of which can be a signal to enact diverse behaviors ranging from gaze stabilization reflexes to predator avoidance or prey capture. To understand how the retina constructs the distinct neural representations required for these behaviors, we investigated two circuits responsible for encoding different aspects of image motion: ON and ON-OFF direction-selective ganglion cells (DSGCs). Using a combination of two-photon targeted whole-cell electrophysiology, pharmacology, and conditional knockout mice, we show that distinct inhibitory pathways independently control tuning for motion velocity and motion direction in these two cell types. We further employ dynamic clamp and numerical modeling techniques to show that asymmetric inhibition provides a velocity-invariant mechanism of directional tuning, despite the strong velocity dependence of classical models of direction selectivity. We therefore demonstrate that invariant representations of motion features by inhibitory interneurons act as computational building blocks to construct distinct, behaviorally relevant signals at the earliest stages of the visual system.

Indexed as

Motion PerceptionRetinal Ganglion CellsAnimalsMicePhotic StimulationRetinaVisual Pathwaysretina, DSGC, amacrine cell, direction selectivity, velocity tuning, speed tuning

Identifiers

PMID35395192
PMCPMC9133153
OpenAlexW4223438179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.