Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35395104›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2022

Experimental investigation of dynamic real-time rotation-including dose reconstruction during prostate tracking radiotherapy.

Casper Gammelmark Muurholm, Thomas Ravkilde, Robin De Roover, Simon Skouboe, Rune Hansen, Wouter Crijns, Tom Depuydt, Per R Poulsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Casper Gammelmark MuurholmDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Thomas RavkildeDepartment of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Robin De RooverDepartment of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Simon SkouboeDanish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Rune HansenDepartment of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Wouter CrijnsDepartment of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Tom DepuydtDepartment of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Per R PoulsenDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

DCCC Radiotherapy (the Danish National Research Center for Radiotherapy)Kom op tegen Kanker (Stand up to Cancer) grant from the Flemish Cancer Society; Varian Medical SystemsKraeftens Bekaempelse (DCS). Grant number: R191-A11526
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypofractionation in prostate radiotherapy is of increasing interest. Steep dose gradients and a large weight on each individual fraction emphasize the need for motion management. Real-time motion management techniques such as multileaf collimator (MLC) tracking or couch tracking typically adjust for translational motion while rotations remain uncompensated with unknown dosimetric impact. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to demonstrate and validate dynamic real-time rotation-including dose reconstruction during radiotherapy experiments with and without MLC and couch tracking.

methodsReal-time dose reconstruction was performed using the in-house developed software DoseTracker. DoseTracker receives streamed target positions and accelerator parameters during treatment delivery and uses a pencil beam algorithm with water density assumption to reconstruct the dose in a moving target. DoseTracker's ability to reconstruct motion-induced dose errors in a dynamically rotating and translating target was investigated during three different scenarios: (1) no motion compensation and translational motion correction with (2) MLC tracking and (3) couch tracking. In each scenario, dose reconstruction was performed online and in real time during delivery of two dual-arc volumetric-modulated arc therapy prostate plans with a prescribed fraction dose of 7 Gy to the prostate and simultaneous intraprostatic lesion boosts with doses of at least 8 Gy, but up to 10 Gy as long as the organs at risk dose constraints were fulfilled. The plans were delivered to a pelvis phantom that replicated three patient-measured motion traces using a rotational insert with 21 layers of EBT3 film spaced 2.5 mm apart. DoseTracker repeatedly calculated the actual motion-including dose increment and the planned static dose increment since the last calculation in 84 500 points in the film stack. The experiments were performed with a TrueBeam accelerator with MLC and couch tracking based on electromagnetic transponders embedded in the film stack. The motion-induced dose error was quantified as the difference between the final cumulative dose with motion and without motion using the 2D 2%/2 mm γ-failure rate and the difference in dose to 95% of the clinical target volume (CTV ΔD

resultsThe dose was reconstructed in all calculation points at a mean frequency of 4.7 Hz. The root-mean-square difference between real-time reconstructed and film-measured motion-induced errors was 3.1%-points (γ-failure rate), 0.13 Gy (CTV ΔD

conclusionsIn a series of phantom experiments, online real-time rotation-including dose reconstruction was performed for the first time. The calculated motion-induced errors agreed well with film measurements. The dose reconstruction provides a valuable tool for monitoring dose delivery and investigating the efficacy of advanced motion-compensation techniques in the presence of translational and rotational motion.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedHumansMalePhantoms, ImagingProstateRadiometryRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assistedcouch trackingintrafraction motion managementMLC trackingprostate cancerreal-time online dose reconstructionsix degree of freedom motion

Identifiers

PMID35395104
PMCPMC9322296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.