Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35395097›Full record

SynthesisThe Journal of animal ecology2022

The influence of seabirds on their breeding, roosting and nesting grounds: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Megan L Grant, Alexander L Bond, Jennifer L Lavers

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Journal of animal ecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Assessing responses of reef island seabirds to environmental and anthropogenic drivers.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  3. The influence of rivers on seabird foraging ecology.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Remote sensing and foraging data illustrate landscape-scale considerations for coastal restoration and avian management.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Decadal change in seabird-driven isotopes on islands with differing invasion histories.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Island restoration to rebuild seabird populations and amplify coral reef functioning.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Megan L GrantInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Newnham, TAS, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0407-8468
Alexander L BondBird Group, Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, Hertfordshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2125-7238
Jennifer L LaversInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, TAS, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7596-6588

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seabird species world-wide are integral to both marine and terrestrial environments, connecting the two systems by transporting vast quantities of marine-derived nutrients and pollutants to terrestrial breeding, roosting and nesting grounds via the deposition of guano and other allochthonous inputs (e.g. eggs, feathers). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis and provide insight into what types of nutrients and pollutants seabirds are transporting, the influence these subsidies are having on recipient environments, with a particular focus on soil, and what may happen if seabird populations decline. The addition of guano to colony soils increased nutrient levels compared to control soils for all seabirds studied, with cascading positive effects observed across a range of habitats. Deposited guano sometimes led to negative impacts, such as guanotrophication, or guano-induced eutrophication, which was often observed where there was an excess of guano or in areas with high seabird densities. While the literature describing nutrients transported by seabirds is extensive, literature regarding pollutant transfer is comparatively limited, with a focus on toxic and bioaccumulative metals. Research on persistent organic pollutants and plastics transported by seabirds is likely to increase in coming years. Studies were limited geographically, with hotspots of research activity in a few locations, but data were lacking from large regions around the world. Studies were also limited to seabird species listed as Least Concern on the IUCN Red List. As seabird populations are impacted by multiple threats and steep declines have been observed for many species world-wide, gaps in the literature are particularly concerning. The loss of seabirds will impact nutrient cycling at localized levels and potentially on a global scale as well, yet it is unknown what may truly happen to areas that rely on seabirds if these populations disappear.

Indexed as

BirdsEnvironmental PollutantsAnimalsEcosystemNutrientsSoilEnvironmental PollutantsNutrientsSoilenrichmentguanomarine-derivedmobile linkvector

Identifiers

PMID35395097
PMCPMC9324971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.