ArticleCancer research2022
Functional Genomic Analysis of CDK4 and CDK6 Gene Dependency across Human Cancer Cell Lines.
Article in Cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cyclins and Cyclin-Dependent Kinases: Structure, Biological Functions, and Innovative Targeting Strategies in Cancer.MedComm · 2026Review
- Rewiring the Molecular Interplay of CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Lung Cancer: From Cell Cycle Control to Immune Microenvironment Remodeling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- WITHDRAWN: From CDK4/6 to CDK2 and KAT: Evolving therapeutic approaches in HR+/HER2- breast cancer.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Article
- Somatic BRCA alterations in breast cancer are associated with distinct biological and clinical patterns according to germline BRCA status.ESMO open · 2026Article
- The evolving landscape of CDK inhibitor use in breast cancer therapy and beyond.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026Review
- 4-Hydroxychalcone Exert the Anti-cancer Potential in Colorectal Cancer Through Targeting CDK6.Biological procedures online · 2026Article
- Beyond CDK4/6 Inhibition: Current Strategies in Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer.Current treatment options in oncology · 2026Review
- Cell-cycle targeted cancer therapy: clinical advances, biological gaps, and the emergence of selective CDK4 inhibitors.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- Emerging Strategies to Inhibit the G1/S Transition for Cancer Therapy.Cancer research · 2026Review
- Frontiers in Cell-Cycle-Targeting Therapies: Addressing the Heterogeneity of the Cancer Cell Cycle.Cancers · 2026Article
- CDK4/6 Inhibitors Plus Endocrine Therapy in Early-Stage HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer: Updated Meta-Analysis of Phase III Trials.Cancers · 2025Review
- Targeting CDK2 for cancer therapy.Cell reports · 2025Review
- Exploiting targeted degradation of cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases for cancer therapeutics: a review.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2025Review
- NAMPT haploinsufficiency is a collateral lethal therapeutic vulnerability in high-risk myeloid malignancies withBlood neoplasia · 2025Article
- Review
- Tumor Suppressors Condition Differential Responses to the Selective CDK2 Inhibitor BLU-222.Cancer research · 2025Article
- Schisandrin B targets CDK4/6 to suppress proliferation and enhance radiosensitivity in nasopharyngeal carcinoma by inducing cell cycle arrest.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Discrete vulnerability to pharmacological CDK2 inhibition is governed by heterogeneity of the cancer cell cycle.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Optimizing therapeutic approaches for HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer: clinical perspectives on biomarkers and treatment strategies post-CDK4/6 inhibitor progression.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2025Review
- Resistance mechanisms and therapeutic strategies of CDK4 and CDK6 kinase targeting in cancer.Nature cancer · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) and CDK6 are key cell-cycle regulators that are frequently dysregulated in human malignancies. CDK4/6 inhibitors are clinically approved for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer, but improved specificity and reduced toxicity might expand their use to other indications. Through analysis of publicly available genome-wide loss-of-function data combined with single and dual-targeting CRISPR assays, we found differential cell proliferation vulnerability of cell lines to either CDK4 deletion alone, CDK6 deletion alone, combined CDK4/CDK6 deletion, or neither. CDK6 expression was the best single predictor of CDK4 (negatively correlated) and CDK6 (positively correlated) dependencies in the cancer cell lines, with adenocarcinoma cell lines being more sensitive to CDK4 deletion and hematologic and squamous cancer cell lines being more sensitive to CDK6 deletion. RB-E2F signaling was confirmed as a main downstream node of CDK4/6 in these experiments as shown by the survival effects of RB1 deletion. Finally, we show in a subset of cancer cell lines not dependent on CDK4/6 that CDK2-CCNE1 is an important alternative dependency for cell proliferation. Together, our comprehensive data exploration and functional experiments delineate the landscape of pan-cancer CDK4/6 gene dependencies and define unique cancer cell populations that might be sensitive to CDK4-selective or CDK6-selective inhibitors. SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides functional genomic insight toward understanding the scenarios in which cancer cells are differentially sensitive to CDK4 or CDK6 inhibition and their implications in current treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.