Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35395049›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2022

Utilizing computer vision for facial behavior analysis in schizophrenia studies: A systematic review.

Zifan Jiang, Mark Luskus, Salman Seyedi, Emily L Griner, Ali Bahrami Rad, Gari D Clifford, Mina Boazak, Robert O Cotes

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zifan JiangDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3570-9461
Mark LuskusDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Salman SeyediDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Emily L GrinerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Ali Bahrami RadDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Gari D CliffordDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Mina BoazakAnimo Sano Psychiatry, PLLC, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Robert O CotesDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.

Funding

Implementing a Maternal health and PRegnancy Outcomes Vision for Everyone (IMPROVE)UL1TR002378 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Andres J Garcia, Elizabeth O. Ofili · 2017 to 2026
$92.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSchizophrenia is a severe psychiatric disorder that causes significant social and functional impairment. Currently, the diagnosis of schizophrenia is based on information gleaned from the patient's self-report, what the clinician observes directly, and what the clinician gathers from collateral informants, but these elements are prone to subjectivity. Utilizing computer vision to measure facial expressions is a promising approach to adding more objectivity in the evaluation and diagnosis of schizophrenia.

methodWe conducted a systematic review using PubMed and Google Scholar. Relevant publications published before (including) December 2021 were identified and evaluated for inclusion. The objective was to conduct a systematic review of computer vision for facial behavior analysis in schizophrenia studies, the clinical findings, and the corresponding data processing and machine learning methods.

resultsSeventeen studies published between 2007 to 2021 were included, with an increasing trend in the number of publications over time. Only 14 articles used interviews to collect data, of which different combinations of passive to evoked, unstructured to structured interviews were used. Various types of hardware were adopted and different types of visual data were collected. Commercial, open-access, and in-house developed models were used to recognize facial behaviors, where frame-level and subject-level features were extracted. Statistical tests and evaluation metrics varied across studies. The number of subjects ranged from 2-120, with an average of 38. Overall, facial behaviors appear to have a role in estimating diagnosis of schizophrenia and psychotic symptoms. When studies were evaluated with a quality assessment checklist, most had a low reporting quality.

conclusionDespite the rapid development of computer vision techniques, there are relatively few studies that have applied this technology to schizophrenia research. There was considerable variation in the clinical paradigm and analytic techniques used. Further research is needed to identify and develop standardized practices, which will help to promote further advances in the field.

Indexed as

Psychotic DisordersSchizophreniaChecklistComputersHumansResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID35395049
PMCPMC8992987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.