Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35395042›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Intrinsic and extrinsic factors influence on an omnivore's gut microbiome.

Sarah M Trujillo, Erin A McKenney, Grant V Hilderbrand, Lindsey S Mangipane, Matthew C Rogers, Kyle Joly, David D Gustine, Joy A Erlenbach, Buck A Mangipane, Diana J R Lafferty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sarah M TrujilloWildlife Ecology and Conservation Science Lab, Department of Biology, Northern Michigan University, Marquette, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6867-2837
Erin A McKenneyDepartment of Applied Ecology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9874-1146
Grant V HilderbrandNatural Resources Team, National Park Service, Anchorage, Alaska, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0051-8315
Lindsey S MangipaneMarine Mammals Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska, United States of America.
Matthew C RogersNational Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Juneau, Alaska, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2543-4684
Kyle JolyGates of the Arctic National Park and Preserve, National Park Service, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States of America.
David D GustineMarine Mammals Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1087-1937
Joy A ErlenbachKodiak National Wildlife Refuge, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Kodiak, Alaska, United States of America.
Buck A MangipaneLake Clark National Park and Preserve, National Park Service, Anchorage, Alaska, United States of America.
Diana J R LaffertyWildlife Ecology and Conservation Science Lab, Department of Biology, Northern Michigan University, Marquette, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8938-7130

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gut microbiomes (GMBs), complex communities of microorganisms inhabiting the gastrointestinal tracts of their hosts, perform countless micro-ecosystem services such as facilitating energy uptake and modulating immune responses. While scientists increasingly recognize the role GMBs play in host health, the role of GMBs in wildlife ecology and conservation has yet to be realized fully. Here, we use brown bears (Ursus arctos) as an ecological model to (1) characterize GMB community composition associated with location, season, and reproductive condition of a large omnivore; (2) investigate how both extrinsic and intrinsic factors influence GMB community membership and structure; and (3) quantify differences in GMB communities among different locations, seasons, sex, and reproductive conditions. To achieve these aims, we subsampled brown bear fecal samples collected during United States National Park Service research activities at three National Parks and Preserves (Katmai, Lake Clark, and Gates of the Arctic) and extracted microbial DNA for 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing and microbial taxonomic classification. We analyzed GMB communities using alpha and beta diversity indices, subsequently using linear mixed models to examine relationships between alpha diversity and extrinsic and intrinsic factors. Katmai brown bears hosted the greatest alpha diversity, whereas Gates brown bears hosted the least alpha diversity. Our results indicate that location and diet drive GMB variation, with bears hosting less phylogenetic diversity as park distance inland increases. Monitoring brown bear GMBs could enable managers to quickly detect and assess the impact of environmental perturbations on brown bear health. By integrating macro and micro-ecological perspectives we aim to inform local and landscape-level management decisions to promote long-term brown bear conservation and management.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeUrsidaeAnimalsEcosystemPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID35395042
PMCPMC8993001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.